Search results
The Canberra reintegrative shaming experiments indicate that offenders are more deterred from repeat offending after experiencing the restorative justice approach of diversionary conferencing than after court proceedings.
- Lawrence W Sherman, Heather Strang
- 1997
Reintegrative shaming theory is clearly applicable to the explanation of secondary deviance, where reintegrative or stigmatic responses are predicted to have different outcomes on offending.
- 36KB
- 12
One such theory, developed by John Braithwaite (1989) is reintegrative shaming. This theory strongly influenced Restorative Justice (RJ) programs that in turn have become a common approach in dealing with juvenile crimes.
- Hee Joo Kim, Jurg Gerber
- 2017
May 10, 2006 · This study tested the implication of reintegrative shaming theory (RST) ( Braithwaite, 1989 ) that social disapproval (shaming) has an effect on the emotions that offenders feel.
- Nathan Harris
- 2006
Three principal questions are addressed: (1) What variables predict parents' use of reintegration and shaming? (2) Do reintegration and shaming statistically interact to affect delinquency, or are their effects additive? (3) Are any observed effects of reintegration and shaming on delinquency merely a result of spuriousness?
- Carter Hay
- 2001
Aug 8, 2011 · This article examines the effectiveness of diversionary restorative justice (RJ) conferences through the eyes of juvenile offenders. In Australia, Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE) are based on Braithwaite’s theory of reintegrative shaming.
People also ask
Is reintegrative shaming theory the same as restorative justice?
Does reintegrative shaming theory affect emotions?
What is reintegrative shaming theory?
What is Braithwaite's reintegrative shaming theory?
Feb 20, 2021 · According to Sherman et al.’s (2015) meta-analysis, RJ can decrease the fear of revictimization and post-traumatic stress among victims and reduce the frequency of reoffending after 2 years compared to conventional justice approaches.
