Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. Although Dulles did not directly refer to nuclear weapons, it was clear that the new policy he was describing would depend upon the “massive retaliatory power” of such weapons to respond to ...

  2. Jan 12, 2016 · Dulles says U.S. to rely on massive nuclear retaliation, Jan. 12, 1954. In a speech on this day in 1954 to the Council on Foreign Relations in New York, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles said ...

  3. Massive retaliation. In the event of an attack from an aggressor, a state would massively retaliate by using a force disproportionate to the size of the attack. Massive retaliation, also known as a massive response or massive deterrence, is a military doctrine and nuclear strategy in which a state commits itself to retaliate in much greater ...

  4. Speech of Secretary of State John Foster Dulles Before the Council on Foreign Relations January 12, 1954 On January 12, 1954, in a speech before the Council on Foreign Relations, an influential New York-based think tank, US Secretary of State John Foster Dulles outlined what became known as the policy of massive retaliation.

  5. John Foster Dulles (right) with President Dwight Eisenhower, 1956. John Foster Dulles was the United States Secretary of State from January 1953 until April 1959. A leading figure in the Eisenhower administration, Dulles was instrumental in shaping US foreign policy. He was a vehement anti-communist who viewed the Soviet Union as a hostile ...

  6. tary of State John Koster Dulles before the Council of rorei^n delations in New York on 12 January 195^. Xr, Dulles said, and implied many other things that evening, but in the aftermath, one would be inclined to believe that the sentence above was the extent of his speech, it was from this statement that the strategy, at

  7. People also ask

  8. Aug 1, 2019 · The timing of Dulles’ ‘massive retaliation’ speech was widely seen as being geared to Indo-China. The use of nuclear weapons was being considered at the time, to help the French out at the battle of Dien Bien Phu. It was then dismissed, but not purely because of a loss of nerve at the crunch.