Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. In other words, a fire is not a foreseeable result that might stem from leaving shards of glass on the ground. Unforeseeable Manner of Harm and Superseding Causes. A person who causes injury to someone else isn't liable for a superseding cause when the superseding cause itself wasn't foreseeable.

  3. Jul 5, 2024 · Foreseeability is a concept in tort law that refers to the ability of a person to anticipate or predict the potential consequences of their actions at the time those actions are taken. It is a criterion used to determine the scope of duty owed by individuals to avoid causing harm to others and plays a crucial role in establishing negligence and ...

  4. Dec 6, 2017 · Definition. In every tort, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant was not only the actual cause of the injury, but also the proximate cause of the injury. Proximate cause requires the plaintiff’s harm to be a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s wrongful action.

  5. Aug 6, 2014 · Foreseeability is critical to the construction industry and to the law as a whole, influencing decisions of a court when someone is negligent or when consequential damages occur as a result of breach of contract. When defining the term “foreseeability,” one must start with the standard definition.

    • William Ibbs, Pirouzan Razavi
    • 2014
  6. Mar 24, 2016 · The rule of reasonable forseeability means that a defendant would only be liable for damages which are a direct and foreseeable result from his actions. It must be possible to be able to draw a causal link between the action of the defendant and the loss suffered by the plaintiff.

  7. May 15, 2024 · If the consequences were not foreseeable, the defendant couldn’t be held liable for the resulting harm. Many jurisdictions rely heavily on whether the alleged damages were a foreseeable result ...