Search results
- Even before deliberation, members of diverse juries were nearly 10% less likely to presume the defendant’s guilt than members of all-white juries. Diverse juries were also more thorough in their evaluation of the evidence.
sparq.stanford.edu/solutions/diverse-juries-make-better-decisions
People also ask
Does diversity affect jury group deliberation?
Why do white jurors prefer a diverse group?
Does diversity reduce racial bias in jury decisions?
Do jurors speak less when deliberating in diverse juries?
Sep 16, 2021 · The present research builds on previous models of jury diversity’s benefits by exploring how diversity impacts the deliberation process. In Study 1, community members ( N = 433) participated in a jury decision-making study manipulating the strength of evidence (ambiguous vs. weak) and the diversity of the jury.
The present research builds on previous models of jury diversity's benefits by exploring how diversity impacts the deliberation process. In Study 1, community members ( N = 433) participated in a jury decision-making study manipulating the strength of evidence (ambiguous vs. weak) and the dive …
May 5, 2006 · "On Racial Diversity and Group Decision Making: Identifying Multiple Effects of Racial Composition on Jury Deliberations" shows that in a mock jury, placing white jurors in diverse groups raised their performance level, encouraging them to cite more facts, make fewer mistakes, deliberate longer, and conduct broader and more accurate discussions ...
Solution. Juries make better decisions when they’re racially diverse. Details. Psychologist Samuel Sommers invited 200 adults to participate in a mock jury experiment. Each jury consisted of six participants. The researcher randomly assigned jury groups to one of two conditions.
- Why Are People of Color Often Excluded from Jury Service?
- Why Is Jury Diversity Important?
- Jury Diversity Reduces Racial Bias
- Jury Diversity Increases The Quality of Jury Decisions
- Conclusion
- Endnotes
Jurors who are members of racial and ethnic minority groups are underrepresented in their participation in jury service for a variety of reasons. Historically, certain groups (Black men in particular) were excluded from jury service so routinely that courts ruled explicit barring of specific demographic groups to be unconstitutional.5 Despite expli...
Ensuring proper representation on juries is important for a variety of reasons. A primary concern is that preventing people from serving on juries based on their membership in a racial/ethnic minority group violates people’s right to serve on a jury.17 Additionally, decisions made by diverse juries are more likely to be seen as fair by the public t...
The assumption that decisions made by diverse juries are more fair than decisions made by nondiverse juries is primarily based on the assumption that increasing diversity reduces the prevalence of racially biased outcomes. Due to the overwhelming racial/ethnic disparities in incarceration and sentencing decisions,19 concerns about bias against peop...
Some basic group research examining the effectiveness of diverse groups can provide insight into the benefits of diversity and how it improves group decision-making. Most psychological models of diversity research use an information exchange model to determine that including varied perspectives (in the form of including people with diverse backgrou...
Psychological research has a great deal to say about how ensuring greater representation on juries may result in superior outcomes in criminal trials. Much of the courts’ emphasis focuses on the reduction of racial bias against defendants who are members of racial/ethnic minority groups in jury decisions, which is largely supported by the psycholog...
1.Andrew G. Ferguson, Why the George Zimmerman Trial’s All-Female Jury Is New, The Atlantic (June 21, 2013), https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/06/why-the-george-zimmerman-trials-all-female-jury-is-news/277103. 2. David K. Li, Kyle Rittenhouse Conducts Random Draw, Seating 7 Women and 5 Men for His Jury, NBC News (Nov. 16, 2021), htt...
Although jury diversity might increase cognitive depletion because it involves interracial interactions (Richeson & Shelton, 2003), it might also reduce racial disparity in verdicts and deliberation quality by improving the quality of deliberation for Black defendants.
May 11, 2023 · The primary goal of this research was to determine whether the racial composition of a jury impacts the outcome and deliberation in a civil retail discrimination lawsuit. We presented a retail discrimination trial video to 30 separate mock juries.
