Search results
Nov 14, 2009 · Reinhold has long been well known for his interest in foundational philosophy. More recently, he has been becoming much better known for his interest in history and the history of philosophy as well. These two interests can appear to be antithetical to one another,...
- Karl Ameriks
- 2010
I have argued that Reinhold's unique insistence on closely combining the features of systematicity and popularity makes his philosophy especially important for anyone trying to understand and evaluate the major metaphilosophical options that have dominated modernity in the wake of Kant's Critical work. 1 On this occasion, I will be extending my ...
Karl Leonhard Reinhold (26 October 1757 – 10 April 1823) was an Austrian philosopher who helped to popularise the work of Immanuel Kant in the late 18th century. His "elementary philosophy" (Elementarphilosophie) also influenced German idealism, notably Johann Gottlieb Fichte, as a critical system grounded in a fundamental first principle.
Apr 30, 2003 · What makes philosophy “scientific,” according to Reinhold, is not simply that it consists of propositions arrived at by thinking, but rather, the logical connection between the propositions in question—that is, their systematic form.
Nov 14, 2009 · Karl (or “Carl,” as Reinhold himself spelled his name) Leonhard Reinhold is a philosophers’ philosopher, so to speak—not widely known outside the circle of cognoscenti except, perhaps, as a popularizer of Kant who repeatedly changed...
- George di Giovanni
- 2010
In this week’s notes we look at Reinhold’s “principle of consciousness” and the “Philosophy of Elements” he derives from it, criticisms of Reinhold by Schulze, and Fichte’s qualified defense of Reinhold. 1
People also ask
Is Reinhold a good philosopher?
Is Reinhold's historical turn a good idea?
Why is Reinhold's “Fundation” essay so popular?
What was Reinhold's philosophy without a nickname?
The appearance of Kant's essay does, however, conveniently substantiate Reinhold's original project, and it reveals his unusual ability to anticipate philosophical events right before their occurrence and, more generally, to be historical in a way that points as much to the future as to the past.
