Search results
Jun 29, 2022 · What is the ‘Kihoto Hollohan’ Case? The law covering the disqualification of lawmakers and the powers of the Speaker in deciding such matters became part of the statute book in 1985 when the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution, commonly known as the ‘anti-defection law’, was adopted.
Feb 18, 1992 · Supreme Court of India. Kihoto Hollohan vs Zachillhu And Others on 18 February, 1992. Equivalent citations: 1992 SCR (1) 686, 1992 SCC SUPL. (2) 651. Bench: L.M. Sharma, Jagdish Saran Verma, S.C. Agrawal. PETITIONER: KIHOTO HOLLOHAN. Vs. RESPONDENT: ZACHILLHU AND OTHERS. DATE OF JUDGMENT18/02/1992. BENCH: VENKATACHALLIAH, M.N. (J) BENCH:
Sep 10, 2018 · The court has differentiated the present case from the cases of Shankari Prasad Singh Deo v. Union of India and State of Bihar [2] and Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan [3] that were relied upon to urge that there is no attraction to the clause (2) of the Article 368.
Jul 19, 2019 · Kihoto Hollohan case referred as the case where the constitution bench of the Supreme Court analyzed in detail the various provisions of the 52nd amendment of the constitution which inserted Tenth schedule.
Jun 10, 2020 · The background of the Kitoho Hollohan case can be traced back to the affected functioning of the legislature, introduction of new jargon of Aaya Ram, Gaya Ram syndrome in political parlance and 1967 elections in which Congress lost in the majority. Thus, there were large scale defections.
Jun 27, 2022 · What is the ‘Kihoto Hollohan’ case? The law covering the disqualification of lawmakers and the powers of the Speaker in deciding such matters became part of the statute book in 1985 when the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution, commonly known as the ‘anti-defection law’, was adopted.
Kihoto Hollohan. Disposal Nature: Others. Netural Citation: 1991 INSC 287. Judgment Delivered by: Hon'ble Mr. Justice L.M. Sharma,Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.N. Venkatachaliah. Respondent: Zachillhu And Others.
Jul 18, 2020 · Prelims level: Highlights of the Judgment. Mains level: Issues over Speaker's discretion in Anti-defection. The 28 YO Kihoto Hollohan judgment has found its relevance in the case of ousted Rajasthan Dy. CM and some MLAs who were issued a notice under the anti-defection law.
Kihoto Hollohan (supra) inasmuch as a writ of quo warranto cannot possibly be granted without first deciding whether Respondent No.3 stands disqualified, which is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the
Jul 18, 2019 · What was the Kihoto Hollohan case? The law covering the disqualification of legislators and the powers of the Speaker in deciding such matters became part of the statute book in 1985 when the Tenth Schedule to the Constitution was adopted.
