Search results
This Court in Controller of Estate Duty (supra), placed reliance on Satrughan Isser v. Sabujpari, & Ors., AIR 1967 SC 272. In case the right to partition by a widow has not been exercised, there is no severance of Hindu coparcenary, and on death of coparcener, there is no dissolution of coparcenary.
Oct 1, 2020 · To know more about the Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma & Others, along with 7 other matters in brief, please refer to the video below: After the amendment Act of 2005, a Division bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Prakash & Others Vs.
So in Vineeta sharma v. Rakesh Sharma a three judge constitutional bench was setup to resolve the issues and give the correct interpretation of section 6 of the amended Hindu Succession Act, 2005.
Sep 29, 2021 · The most recent formulation of the law on this point is found in the decision of the Supreme Court in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma[3]. In this article, the authors will set out the position of law on this aspect under Mitakshara/classical Hindu Law, changes brought about by the decision in Vineeta Z 4 and its implications.
Jan 18, 2024 · This paper attempts to provide a comprehensive review of the historic case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma, focusing on the legal issues of women’s property rights in India, as well as the challenges and progress women have made in gaining equal rights in property ownership. It delves into the history of women’s property rights, the 2005 ...
Jan 13, 2022 · One of the most welcomed and awaited verdicts on the rights of women, especially as daughters in the property of the family by birth, had arrived in a famous case of Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, which was also part of various Special leave petitions dealt with that major issue.
Jan 22, 2021 · On 11-8-2020, the Supreme Court of India passed a landmark judgment in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma [1], stating that the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005 [2] will have a retrospective effect. The 2005 Amendment amended Section 6 of the Act in order to align with the constitutional belief of gender equality.
In a significant and groundbreaking verdict, the Supreme Court delivered a momentous judgment on August 11th, 2020, in the case of Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, effectively dismantling male chauvinism prevalent in the division of Hindu ancestral property.
Aug 11, 2020 · Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma on 11 August, 2020. Warning on translation. Select the following parts of the judgment. For entire document. Select how this document cites others. Select cite ... Filter cite-text by sentiment. [Cites 7, Cited by 0]
Apr 16, 2021 · This is a landmark judgment that revolves around the concept of joint Hindu family and coparcenary rights of the daughters. Citation : REFERENCE: Civil Appeal No. Diary No. 32601 of 2018. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11th August 2020. JUDGES: Justice Arun Mishra, Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, Justice M. R. Shah. PARTIES.
