Search results
Case Summary – Indra Sawhney v Union of India & Ors. Affirmative action, which is commonly referred to in India as reservation, was an earnest attempt by the framers of the Constitution to bring in socio-economic equality in Indian society, particularly, the reservation in matters of Public Employment as provided in Article 16 of the Constitution.
Mar 13, 2024 · This article provides an exhaustive case analysis of the landmark case of Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992) and an overview of the subsequent precedent case laws related to reservation from an analytical viewpoint. Introduction. Brief details of Indra Sawhney v. Union of India and Ors. (1992) Name of the case. Date of the judgement.
Indra Sawhney, the petitioner in this case, made three principal arguments against the Order: The extension of reservation violated the Constitutional guarantee of equality of opportunity. Caste was not a reliable indicator of backwardness. The efficiency of public institutions was at risk.
May 10, 2022 · Indra Sawhney vs. Union of India case gave the landmark judgement which dealt with the most lagging and sensitive issue of reservation for backward classes based on reports by Kelkar Commission and Mandal Commission.
Jun 8, 2021 · Here is the Indra Sawhney case summary, a short brief to help understand this remarkable case. Background of the Indra Sawhney Case. Kalelkar Commission. When India became independent in 1947, the government took affirmative action for the Depressed Class, the Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs), which provided the benefits.
Dec 27, 2023 · Indra Sawhney v Union of India, also known as the Mandal verdict, was a landmark public interest litigation case. It was delivered by a 9-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court of India in 1992. The case challenged the government's decision to implement the recommendations of the Mandal Commission.
The cases in this batch raise common issues relating to the identification of 'creamy layer' among the Backward Classes in the State of Kerala and the implementation of the law declared and directions issued in Indira Sawhney Vs. Union of India ( 1992 (Suppl) 3, SCC 217).
May 30, 2024 · The Indra Sawhney case established important principles regarding reservations in India. It reaffirmed the significance of caste in determining backwardness and emphasized the need to balance affirmative action with the principles of meritocracy and equal opportunity.
May 27, 2021 · Appellant: Indra Sawhney Etc. Respondent: Union of India and Others. Brief facts: As we all know the matter of reservation has always been in limelight since the day, we dreamt of Britishers free India. This case has become a landmark due to its history.
Oct 19, 2023 · The Indra Sawhney vs Union of India, commonly known as the Mandal Commission case, was a landmark legal battle in India. The Supreme Court upheld the concept of reservations for socially and economically backward classes, emphasising their importance in achieving social justice and upliftment.
