Search results
1. The question which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the minimum period of six months stipulated under Section 13B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (the Act) for a motion for passing decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent is mandatory or can be relaxed in any exceptional situations. f2.
Sep 16, 2021 · Date of Judgement: 12/09/2017. Equivalent Citation: 2017 (8) SCC 746; 2017 (9) JT 106. Case no: Civil Appeal no. 11158 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition No. 20184 of 2017) Case Type: Civil Appeal. Petitioner: Amardeep Singh. Respondent: Harveen Kaur. Bench: Uday Umesh Lalit, Adarsh Kumar Goel, Hon’ble J.J. Statutes Referred:
Apr 15, 2022 · Amardeep Singh vs. Harveen Kaur case is one of the recent landmark cases in the development of family law as it clarified the issue of whether the minimum period of six months stipulated under section 13(B)(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for a motion for passing a decree of divorce based on mutual consent mandatory or can be relaxed in any ...
Amardeep Singh Vs Harveen Kaur, AIR 2017 SC 4417. Facts. The Appellant (Amardeep Singh) married the Respondent on January 16, 2001. (Harveen Kaur). Two children were born out of wedlock in 1995 and 2003, respectively. As a result of their disagreements, the couple has been living separately since 2008.
Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur . Supreme Court Of India Sep 12, 2017. Subsequent. References. CaseIQ. (AI Recommendations) Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur . Smart Summary (Beta) Facts: The parties have been living separately since 2008 and the respondent wife is to be given permanent alimony of Rs.2.75 crores.
case titled Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur, 2017(4) RCR (Civil) 608 the case of the petitioners does not fall within the parameters fixed to waive off the stipulated period of six months as mentioned under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act. In the
1. The question which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the minimum period of six months stipulated under Section 13B (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (the Act) for a motion for passing decree of divorce on the basis of mutual consent is mandatory or can be relaxed in any exceptional situations. 4.
Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur, 2017 PLRonline 0009. by PLRonline. in SCeJ. 3. Supreme Court Of India. Before: Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel , Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ. Amardeep Singh. v. Harveen Kaur. Civil Appeal No. 11158 Of 2017 (Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 20184 Of 2017) 12.09.2017.
Feb 14, 2024 · Amardeep Singh vs Harveen Kaur Judgment. The Supreme Court of India in Amardeep Singh vs Harveen Kaur delved into the interpretation of Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, particularly focusing on the role and nature of the six-month cooling-off period delineated in Section 13B(2).
May 12, 2020 · Title of the case: Amardeep Singh v, Harveen Kaur on 12 September, 2017. Citation: Civil Appeal NO. 11158 OF 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil)No. 20184 of 2017) Court: SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. Bench: Justice Adarsh Kumar Goel. Parties: Appellant: Amardeep Singh. Respondent: Harveen Kaur Brief Facts:
