Search results
The false positive rate gives the proportion of falsely identified positives amongst all actual negatives. (lower is better) Obviously, the most right curve (combined Joint Baysian) is worst, because for a fixed true positive rate it has always the highest false positive rate. But how would one decide if the red or the black curve is better?
Jan 26, 2017 · A 'false positive' occurs when the disease is not present even though the test is positive. So, this is the event B ∧AC B ∧ A C. So, if you want to know the probability of getting a false positive, that is P(B ∧AC) P (B ∧ A C), and that we can work out in two different ways: P(B ∧AC) = P(B) ∗ P(AC|B) P (B ∧ A C) = P (B) ∗ P (A C ...
May 26, 2020 · "A certain disease has an incidence rate of 2%. If the false negative rate is 10% and the false positive rate is 1%, compute the probability that a person who tests positive actually has the disease." For this question, why do we need to use Bayes' Theorem? I'm having trouble understanding why the answer is not simply 99% (100% - 1%).
Aug 31, 2022 · So that reduction in false positive rate will have a huge impact on the posterior conditional probability of actually having the disease. As an exercise, consider the following scenarios: What if the disease is more common; e.g., $\Pr[D] = 0.40$? Does a double positive test substantially change the probability over a single positive test in ...
May 25, 2017 · A cancer test is 90 percent positive when cancer is present. It gives a false positive in 10 percent of the tests when the cancer is not present. If 2 percent of the population has this cancer what is the probability that someone has cancer given that the test is positive? I multiplied the 90 by 10 divided by 90 times 10 plus 2.
Oct 7, 2017 · The false positive rate is P(A ∣∼ V) P (A ∣∼ V) (probability the test erroneously comes back positive when you don't have the virus) and the effectiveness is P(A ∣ V) P (A ∣ V) (probability the test correctly comes back positive when the virus is present). You use these, P(V) P (V) (which you identified correctly) and bayes to ...
Dec 2, 2021 · Suppose that one person in 10,000 people has a rare genetic disease. There is an excellent test for the disease; 99.5% of people with the disease test positive and only 0.06% who do not have the di...
Jun 24, 2017 · That means that 5 per cent of the people who don’t have cognitive impairment will test, falsely, as positive. That doesn’t sound bad. It’s directly analogous to tests of significance which will give 5 per cent of false positives when there is no real effect, if we use a p-value of less than 5 per cent to mean ‘statistically significant’.
But what I am interested in is estimating the true positive and false positive rates. \ Classifier Data T F T p_tp F p_fp I have sampled 500 records that I have annotated with class labels.
Apr 26, 2022 · I'm learning about the conditional probabilities and need some help in solving a example: Suppose a test method gives positive results for the infected person 65% of time and negative results for healthy person 99.93% of the time. In the language of false negative & false positive-> false negative rate is 35%, while false positive rate is 0.07%.
