Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Search results
Aug 6, 2017 · So I was thinking of linking to the "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" and using their definition of normative morality which is "to refer to a code of conduct that, GIVEN SPECIFIED CONDITIONS, would be put forward by all rational persons." But then I realized that I'm not sure how respected the site is.
Rogue_the_Saint. • 4 yr. ago. The online Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a reputable academic source. While the encyclopedia is based out of Stanford, the editors solicit experts in all fields of philosophy to contribute to the project. As a result, the SEP has come to represent an accurate authoritative reservoir of philosophical ...
One method that might work for you is to look the articles of various philosophical problems. They're usually about specific and narrow topics that might be comprehended only by reading what's in that article. Entries about huge topics like epistemology, ethics, ontology, etc. would probably be too much for a beginner.
Nov 20, 2020 · For what it is worth, the IEP and the SEP are peer-reviewed, and highly credible sources of philosophical information. I would have to agree - as a former philosophy undergrad major that the SEP was at times quite complex and pretty advanced for me to understand! By comparison, the IEP was much more accessible for me as an undergrad!
May 4, 2023 · It's a good source but I wouldn't recommend it for beginners. It's aimed more at professional philosophers and as such, can indeed leave a lot of context unsaid. It also has an analytic "viewpoint" (I'm avoiding the word bias here) which may be harder to detect if you're unfamiliar with the philosophy world as a whole. 20.
Jul 24, 2023 · The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is intended to serve as an authoritative reference work suitable for use by professionals and students in the field of philosophy, as well as by all others interested in authoritative discussions on philosophical topics. Entries should therefore be scholarly, written with the highest of professional ...
Feb 24, 2021 · That said, it's an encyclopedia. So, ideally, you use it in the way an encyclopedia is meant to be used: as a general audience introduction to a topic and to the main lines of controversy in an area and as a source of references to explore in greater detail. In short: The SEP is a great place to start, but you have to look into the citations if ...
Mar 31, 2019 · Both answers so far say Stanford, and I think I'd overall agree in terms of overview, but I recommend caution when comparing across different philosophic encyclopedias. Last semester, I undertook an independent writing project doing a biography on David Hume and I was amazed on some of the inconsistencies in details there was between the different encyclopedias.
Aug 2, 2021 · The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy has a 'shorter' and a 'concise' version, with the latter just being the 'intros' or 'abstracts' from the 10 volume version, and the former having a bit longer, but fewer entries. As mentioned further up, The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a popular, single-book, condensed version of ...
Apr 8, 2021 · The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a peer reviewed source and so is as “real” as a printed encyclopedia in terms of being trustworthy. I would not recommend citing any encyclopedia in a paper intended to be published in an academic journal, however. It is a great resource, as mentioned byProfessorOnEdge, for getting an overview of a ...
