Search results
Apr 29, 2014 · SQL Server requires the + operator (thanks to HVD for setting me straight!). Share. Improve this answer ...
Apr 6, 2009 · Yes; Microsoft themselves recommend using <> over != specifically for ANSI compliance, e.g. in Microsoft Press training kit for 70-461 exam, "Querying Microsoft SQL Server", they say "As an example of when to choose the standard form, T-SQL supports two “not equal to” operators: <> and !=. The former is standard and the latter is not.
The @CustID means it's a parameter that you will supply a value for later in your code. This is the best way of protecting against SQL injection. Create your query using parameters, rather than concatenating strings and variables. The database engine puts the parameter value into where the placeholder is, and there is zero chance for SQL injection.
Mar 23, 2017 · as 'Throughput-run_1_8_11' is invalid SQL. Single quotes are for string literals. Double quotes are for ...
Aug 19, 2016 · In My Case Problem was little different I wanted to joing two tables and then copy data from Table2 to Table1 respective column My Query (DB2) update Table1 T1, Table2 T2 set T1.DEST_COLMN= T2.SRC_COLMN where T1.ID= T2.ID
Sep 15, 2008 · The CASE expression cannot be used to control the flow of execution of Transact-SQL statements, statement blocks, user-defined functions, and stored procedures. If your needs can not be satisfied by these limitations (for example, a need to return differently shaped result sets dependent on some condition) then SQL Server does also have a procedural IF keyword.
May 31, 2023 · If your SQL dialect supports CHARINDEX, it's a lot easier to use it instead: SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE CHARINDEX('word1', Column1) > 0 AND CHARINDEX('word2', Column1) > 0 AND CHARINDEX('word3', Column1) > 0 Also, please keep in mind that this and the method in the accepted answer only cover substring matching rather than word matching.
Jan 5, 2013 · Your select will be wrong for the example From_date: 2012-12-30 to To_Date: 2013-01-05. These dates are inside the desired range but in your SQL won't be returned because they start before the range, but they finish inside the range. –
This is the easy thing I've come up with. It uses a common table expression (CTE) and a partition window (I think these features are in SQL 2008 and later). This example finds all students with duplicate name and dob. The fields you want to check for duplication go in the OVER clause. You can include any other fields you want in the projection.
@Digitalsa1nt (100 * 2) / 4 = 50, (2/4) * 100 = 50 as long as the enumerator is is the part being multiplied. Due to precedence of SQL statements it will be the same. however, due to data types if using 100 you can still get the result rounded to 0 decimals you desire for the % where as if you put it after the division operation you would have to make sure that you cast to a data type that can handle the decimal places otherwise you will end up with 100 or 0 and never an actual percent
