Search results
Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India on 25 January, 1978 Equivalent citations: 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621 Author: M. Hameedullah Beg Bench: M. Hameedullah Beg, Y.V. Chandrachud, P.N. Bhagwati, V.R. Krishnaiyer, N.L. Untwalia, Syed Murtaza Fazalali, P.S. Kailasam PETITIONER: MANEKA GANDHI Vs.
Feb 21, 2024 · While Article 14 guarantees equality before the law, Article 19 protects freedom of speech and expression, and Article 21 ensures the right to life and personal liberty, their synergy prevents arbitrary application of the law, as observed in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and many other cases.
May 3, 2020 · Case title: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978) Court: Supreme Court of India. Bench: M.Hameedullah , Y.V.Chandrachud, P.N. Bhagwati, V.R. Krishna Iyer & N.L. Untwalia, S.M. Fazalal, & P.S. Kailasam. (7 judge bench) Petitioner: Maneka Gandhi. Respondent: Union of India. Citation: 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621. Facts of the case
The landmark ruling in Maneka Gandhi versus Union of India, which stands as a bulwark of the Right of Personal Liberty granted by Article 21 of the Constitution, started when the passport of the petitioner in this case, was impounded by the authorities under the provisions of the Passport Act.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in which the Court significantly expanded the interpretation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It overruled A. K. Gopalan v.
Jun 1, 2020 · The Maneka Gandhi judgment was a decent judgment and is perhaps the best judgment that Indian Supreme Court has ever given. The judgment’s most noteworthy element was the interlinking it built up between the arrangements of Article 14, 19 and 21.
Petitioner: Maneka Gandhi. Disposal Nature: Petition Disposed Off. Neutral Citation: 1978 INSC 16. Judgment Delivered by: Honble Mr. Justice M. Hameedullah Beg,Honble Mr. Justice P.N. Bhagwati,Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.S. Kailasam,Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer,Honble Mr. Justice Y.V. Chandrachud. Respondent: