Search results
Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India on 25 January, 1978 Equivalent citations: 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621 Author: M. Hameedullah Beg Bench: M. Hameedullah Beg, Y.V. Chandrachud, P.N. Bhagwati, V.R. Krishnaiyer, N.L. Untwalia, Syed Murtaza Fazalali, P.S. Kailasam PETITIONER: MANEKA GANDHI Vs.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India , AIR 1978 SC 597, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in which the Court significantly expanded the interpretation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India .
May 3, 2020 · Case title: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978) Court: Supreme Court of India. Bench: M.Hameedullah , Y.V.Chandrachud, P.N. Bhagwati, V.R. Krishna Iyer & N.L. Untwalia, S.M. Fazalal, & P.S. Kailasam. (7 judge bench) Petitioner: Maneka Gandhi. Respondent: Union of India. Citation: 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621. Facts of the case
Feb 21, 2024 · This article talks about the landmark case of Maneka Gandhi and its impact on law and society. It also explores the interpretations of Article 21 and other fundamental rights in the Golden Triangle. This article has been published by Shashwat Kaushik.
Digital Supreme Court Reports. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union Of India. SCR Citation: [1978] 2 S.C.R. 621. Year/Volume: 1978/ Volume 2. Date of Judgment: 25 January 1978.
Jun 1, 2020 · The Maneka Gandhi judgment was a decent judgment and is perhaps the best judgment that Indian Supreme Court has ever given. The judgment’s most noteworthy element was the interlinking it built up between the arrangements of Article 14, 19 and 21.
Maneka Gandhi has been unfolded by this Court in Hoskot and Batra. Today, human rights jurisprudence in India has a constitutional status and sweep. [573 A, 574 D] 6. Rulings of this Court have highlighted the fact that the framers of the Constitution have freed the powers under Art. 32 from the rigid restraints of 559 the traditional English ...
Supreme Court of India. Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India on 25 January, 1978. PETITIONER: MANEKA GANDHI. Vs. RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA. DATE OF JUDGMENT25/01/1978. BENCH: BEG, M. HAMEEDULLAH (CJ) BENCH: BEG, M. HAMEEDULLAH (CJ) CHANDRACHUD, Y.V. BHAGWATI, P.N. KRISHNAIYER, V.R. UNTWALIA, N.L. FAZALALI, SYED MURTAZA KAILASAM, P.S.
The landmark ruling in Maneka Gandhi versus Union of India, which stands as a bulwark of the Right of Personal Liberty granted by Article 21 of the Constitution, started when the passport of the petitioner in this case, was impounded by the authorities under the provisions of the Passport Act.
Issue. Whether Section 10 (3) (c), insofar as it empowers the Passport Authority to impound a passport “in the interests of the general public” was violative of the equality clause contained in Article 14 of the Constitution.
