Search results
The case specifically over-ruled the view taken in Gopalan's case that the approach and form of the State action alone need to be considered and the fact of loss of fundamental rights of the individual in general will be ignored.
May 3, 2020 · Case title: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978) Court: Supreme Court of India. Bench: M.Hameedullah , Y.V.Chandrachud, P.N. Bhagwati, V.R. Krishna Iyer & N.L. Untwalia, S.M. Fazalal, & P.S. Kailasam. (7 judge bench) Petitioner: Maneka Gandhi. Respondent: Union of India. Citation: 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621. Facts of the case
The landmark ruling in Maneka Gandhi versus Union of India, which stands as a bulwark of the Right of Personal Liberty granted by Article 21 of the Constitution, started when the passport of the petitioner in this case, was impounded by the authorities under the provisions of the Passport Act.
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in which the Court significantly expanded the interpretation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It overruled A. K. Gopalan v.
Feb 21, 2024 · This article talks about the landmark case of Maneka Gandhi and its impact on law and society. It also explores the interpretations of Article 21 and other fundamental rights in the Golden Triangle. This article has been published by Shashwat Kaushik .
Petitioner: Maneka Gandhi. Disposal Nature: Petition Disposed Off. Neutral Citation: 1978 INSC 16. Judgment Delivered by: Honble Mr. Justice M. Hameedullah Beg,Honble Mr. Justice P.N. Bhagwati,Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.S. Kailasam,Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer,Honble Mr. Justice Y.V. Chandrachud. Respondent:
Jun 1, 2020 · The Maneka Gandhi judgment was a decent judgment and is perhaps the best judgment that Indian Supreme Court has ever given. The judgment’s most noteworthy element was the interlinking it built up between the arrangements of Article 14, 19 and 21.
