Search results
Jun 10, 2020 · Court: Madras High Court. Full Case Name: Chinnaya V. Rammaya (1882) Date Decided: 21 st October 1987. Citations: ILR (1876-82) 4 Mad 137. Judges: Innes J, Kindersley J. Appellant: Venkata Chinnaya. Respondent: Venkata RamayyaGaru.
Apr 15, 2023 · The case of Chinnaya vs. Ramayya (1876) deals with the concept of privity of consideration, an idea about which is necessary to gather prior to detailed analysis of the case in hand. It is necessary to understand that under the contract law, privity of contract is a necessity.
Apr 15, 2024 · Chinnaya v Ramayya is a landmark case in Indian contract law that addresses the concept of consideration in a contract. The case is significant for its interpretation of Section 2 (d) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, which deals with the notion of consideration in a contract.
Sep 26, 2023 · The case of Chinnaya vs. Ramayya is a seminal judgment rendered by the Madras High Court. It revolves around the intricate concept of “Privity of Consideration” within the realm of contract law.
Dec 7, 2021 · In Chinnaya v. Ramayya, the concept that consideration may move from a third party, rather than directly between the promisor and promisee, is exemplified. Here, the third party is Chinnaya’s mother. She provided the consideration by granting land to Chinnaya with the stipulation that Chinnaya pay an annuity to Ramayya (the mother’s sister).
Jul 7, 2023 · The case of Chinnaya vs. Ramayya, is a landmark case in the history of Indian Contracts. This case has clarified the applicability and concept of the “Privity to consideration” mainly in the Indian Context.
Sep 26, 2023 · Facts: This case involves 3 people. An old lady, her daughter, Venkata RamayyaGaru (respondent) and her sister, Venkata Chinnaya i.e. the aunt of the respondent (appellant). The old lady gives a piece of real estate owned by her to her daughter by an official gift deed.
