Search results
Jul 2, 2014 · Law mandates the police officer to state the facts and record the reasons in writing which led him to come to a conclusion covered by any of the provisions aforesaid, while making such arrest. Law further requires the police officers to record the reasons in writing for not making the arrest.
Sep 20, 2024 · The case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2014) is an important judgement for constitutional and criminal cases. The court recognised the menace of arbitrary arrests even in non-cognisable offences.
In this case the marriage between appellant (husband) and the respondent (wife) marriage was solemnized on 1 st July 2007. The respondent (wife) alleged that her in-laws demanded the dowry from her, and the appellant (husband) also supported his parents.
Aug 24, 2023 · Arnesh Kumar vs State of Bihar (2014) case (Arnesh Kumar Guidelines), is an important ruling by the Indian Supreme Court. This ruling emphasises that arrests should not be common, especially when the potential punishment is less than seven years of imprisonment.
Case Name: Arnesh Kumar V State Of Bihar (2014) 8 Scc 273 - Court Name: In The Supreme Court Of India At Delhi - Judges: Justice Chandramauli Kr. Prasad And Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose - Petitioner Name- Arnesh Kumar - Respondent Name- State Of Bihar - Date Of Judgement: 2nd July 2014
Jul 2, 2014 · ARNESH KUMAR vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ANR. State Of Bihar & Anr. 1. Headnote. CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973:
Arnesh Kumar Guidelines or Arnesh Kumar vs State of Bihar (2014) is a landmark judgement of the Indian Supreme Court, [1] [2] stating arrests should be an exception, in cases where the punishment is less than seven years of imprisonment. [3]
Mar 24, 2024 · The guidelines issued by the Supreme Court of India in the Arnesh Kumar case are addressed; they support the protection of individual rights against unwarranted detention and advocate for moderation in arrests.
The maximum sentence provided under Section 498-A IPC is imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and fine whereas the maximum sentence provided under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act is two years and with fine.
Feb 20, 2014 · \232 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRL.) No.809 OF 2013 IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NO.4075 OF 2013 Arnesh Kumar & Ors. ... Petitioner (s) Versus The State of Bihar & Anr. ... Respondent (s) O R D E R. Delay condoned.
