Search results
The landmark ruling in Maneka Gandhi versus Union of India, which stands as a bulwark of the Right of Personal Liberty granted by Article 21 of the Constitution, started when the passport of the petitioner in this case, was impounded by the authorities under the provisions of the Passport Act.
The case specifically over-ruled the view taken in Gopalan's case that the approach and form of the State action alone need to be considered and the fact of loss of fundamental rights of the individual in general will be ignored.
Aug 25, 2020 · To get over the judgments of the Supreme Court in the Golaknath case (1967), RC Cooper case (1970), and Madhavrao Scindia case (1970), the then government headed by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi had enacted major amendments to the Constitution (the 24 th, 25 th, 26 th and 29 th).
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in which the Court significantly expanded the interpretation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It overruled A. K. Gopalan v.
May 3, 2020 · Case title: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978) Court: Supreme Court of India. Bench: M.Hameedullah , Y.V.Chandrachud, P.N. Bhagwati, V.R. Krishna Iyer & N.L. Untwalia, S.M. Fazalal, & P.S. Kailasam. (7 judge bench) Petitioner: Maneka Gandhi. Respondent: Union of India. Citation: 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621. Facts of the case
Feb 21, 2024 · This article talks about the landmark case of Maneka Gandhi and its impact on law and society. It also explores the interpretations of Article 21 and other fundamental rights in the Golden Triangle. This article has been published by Shashwat Kaushik .
Jun 1, 2020 · The Maneka Gandhi judgment was a decent judgment and is perhaps the best judgment that Indian Supreme Court has ever given. The judgment’s most noteworthy element was the interlinking it built up between the arrangements of Article 14, 19 and 21.
The Supreme Court of India's landmark decision in the case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, commonly referred to as the Maneka Gandhi case, marked a significant turning point in the court's approach to interpreting and safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.
Apr 21, 2021 · In the Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India case, the petitioner (Maneka Gandhi) was a journalist who was about to travel to another country for some of her official business. Because of this purpose, it was applied for the passport by the petitioner under the Indian Passports Act of 1967.
In the case of Maneka Gandhi v Union of India, [10] the court found that "Democracy is based essentially on free debate and open discussion, for that is the only corrective of government action in a democratic setup." In 1980, Gandhi gave birth to a son, Feroze, named after his paternal grandfather. Her mother-in-law added the name Varun.
