Search results
Nov 12, 2013 · Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors on 12 November, 2013. Warning on translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. Select the following parts of the judgment. Facts. Issues. Petitioner's Arguments.
Apr 23, 2024 · The Hon’ble Supreme Court in this case (Lalita Kumari v. Govt of UP) ruled that Section 154(1) of the CrPC mandates a police officer to register an FIR if any information received by or conveyed to such officer discloses the commission of any cognizable offence.
Apr 16, 2020 · Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & Ors. The petitioner, a minor girl was kidnapped by local goons. Her father, Bhola Kamat went to police station to lodge an FIR which police refused. The father further went to the superintendent of police and under his direction a FIR was registered.
Aug 15, 2023 · The case of Lalita Kumari vs. State of UP is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of India that deals with the issue of police inaction in the face of cognizable offences, thereby addressing the importance of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Get free access to the complete judgment in Lalita Kumari v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others on CaseMine.
May 8, 2024 · Facts. This petition was filed before the Supreme Court by Lalita kumari who is minor through her father under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950 (COI) for the issuance of writ of Habeas Corpus for the protection of his minor daughter who has been kidnapped.
Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. & Ors., 2013, was delivered by a Five-Judge Constitution Bench of the Honorable Supreme Court on 12th November 2013. In the present appeal, the appellant Lalita Kumari has appealed against the Government of UP through a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. Issue.
