Search results
- Dictionarysquash/skwɒʃ/
verb
- 1. crush or squeeze (something) with force so that it becomes flat, soft, or out of shape: "wash and squash the cans before depositing them" Similar
- 2. suppress or subdue (a feeling or action): "the mournful sound did nothing to squash her high spirits"
noun
- 1. a state of being squeezed or forced into a small or restricted space: "it was a bit of a squash but he didn't seem to mind"
- 2. a sweet concentrated liquid made from or flavoured with fruit juice, which is diluted to make a drink: British "orange squash"
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
Dec 29, 2022 · In order to transform the history as shown in the very first example, you have to run something like. git rebase -i HEAD~4. change the "commands" to squash for all the commits apart from the first one, and then close your editor. Note about altering history. In Git, commits are never edited.
Mar 11, 2010 · Merge Squash: retains the changes but omits the individual commits from history. Rebase: This moves the entire feature branch to begin on the tip of the master branch, effectively incorporating all of the new commits in master. More on here. The first two diagrams come from About pull request merges on the GitHub Docs.
95. In the branch you would like to combine the commits on, run: git rebase -i HEAD~(n number of commits back to review) example: git rebase -i HEAD~2. This will open the text editor and you must switch the 'pick' in front of each commit with 'squash' if you would like these commits to be merged together.
Don’t squash: the small commits are useful especially for later tracking down of bugs with git bisect, and anyway you don’t want to change the history much. Just use a merge commit (git merge --no-ff) to keep the history organized. answered Mar 18, 2019 at 22:21. Marnen Laibow-Koser. 6,273 1 29 34.
Apr 5, 2016 · This also explains why the suggestion by @josemigallas is not enough. Thus you can do: git switch master. git merge dev --no-ff --no-commit. This will properly merge the histories of the two branches (see git log --graph) and give you exactly one extra commit on the master branch (instead of all 180).
Jul 22, 2019 · git merge --squash produces a non-merge commit. Therefore, Git will not recognize that the commit you are merging from as the merge base. This leads to unwanted merge result when 1) change A to B on branch X, 2) git merge --squash from branch X to branch Y, and 3) change B to A (revert) on branch X, and 4) merge X into Y.
May 12, 2014 · This is what git merge --no-ff would produce. It forces Git to create a merge commit to bring two histories together. git merge --squash would do something a little different. It prevents Git from creating a merge commit, but still pulls in the changes C and D made, so your tree looks like this: A --> B --> F'. C --> D.
Oct 14, 2019 · See git-rebase [1] for details. --squash (also the --fixup flags) takes a commit as an argument, and formats the message for use with --autosquash. It's possible to set rebase.autosquash = true in your config to make the whole process shorter. If you want to squash your last N commits: This will put the head on HEAD~N, so index and the working ...
May 17, 2017 · 2. If you want to squash commits go to HEAD (last) commit and just: git reset --soft HEAD~2 && git commit. After enter this command you will be asked to write commit message to new commit. This command will squash your last two commits in one with new commit message you write.
Aug 18, 2014 · Back to the solution: (to squash all your commit) reset the index to master: git checkout yourBranch. git reset $(git merge-base master $(git branch --show-current)) git add -A. git commit -m "one commit on yourBranch". This isn't perfect as it implies you know from which branch " yourBranch " is coming from.
