Search results
- Dictionarycourt/kɔːt/
noun
- 1. a body of people presided over by a judge, judges, or magistrate, and acting as a tribunal in civil and criminal cases: "she will take the matter to court" Similar
- 2. a quadrangular area, either open or covered, marked out for ball games such as tennis or squash: "a squash court" Similar
verb
- 1. be involved with (someone) romantically, with the intention of marrying: dated "he was courting a girl from the neighbouring farm" Similar
- 2. pay special attention to (someone) in an attempt to win their support or favour: "Western politicians courted the leaders of the newly independent states" Similar
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
People also ask
Do you have to pay court fees?
Can a public visit a court?
How do justices participate in a case?
Learn the meaning of court as a noun and a verb in different contexts, such as law, sports, royalty, and relationships. Find out how to use court in sentences and phrases with synonyms and translations.
- English (US)
COURT meaning: 1. a place where trials and other legal cases...
- Znaczenie Court, Definicja W Cambridge English Dictionary
court definicja: 1. a place where trials and other legal...
- Court Spanish Translation
COURT translate: tribunal, pista, cancha, corte, corte,...
- Courthouse
COURTHOUSE definition: 1. a building that contains law...
- Courtroom
COURTROOM definition: 1. a room where a law court meets: 2....
- Court: Catalan Translation
court translate: pista, tribunal, jutjat, cort. Learn more...
- English (US)
Learn the various meanings and uses of the word court as a noun and a verb, with synonyms, examples, and etymology. Find out how to court someone, a place, or a favor, and the difference between court and courtroom.
- Overview
- Judicial legitimacy
- Keeping the peace
- GeneratedCaptionsTabForHeroSec
court, a person or body of persons having judicial authority to hear and resolve disputes in civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military cases. The word court, which originally meant simply an enclosed place, also denotes the chamber, hall, building, or other place where judicial proceedings are held. (See also military law; arbitration.)
This article deals with the operations of the judicial branch of government. It explores some of the fundamental relationships of this branch with legislative and executive branches and analyzes the functions, structure and organization, and key personnel of courts, the judges. It also compares the systems of the two predominant legal traditions of the contemporary world: common law, represented by England, the United States, Canada, Australia, and other countries deriving their legal systems from the English model; and civil law, as represented by countries of western Europe and Latin America and certain Asian and African countries that have modeled their legal systems on western European patterns.
Legal scholars are fond of quoting the maxim that courts have neither the “power of the purse nor of the sword,” meaning that they, unlike other institutions of government, rarely have the power to raise and spend money and do not command the institutions of coercion (the police and the military). Without force or monetary inducements, courts are weak institutions, because they are denied the most efficacious means of ensuring that their decisions are complied with and enforced.
The lack of formal institutional powers has led some observers to conclude that courts are the least-effective agents of government. However, such arguments ignore what is surely the most significant powers of courts—their institutional legitimacy. An institution is legitimate when it is perceived as having the right or the authority to make decisions and when its decisions are viewed as worthy of respect or obedience. Judicial legitimacy derives from the belief that judges are impartial and that their decisions are grounded in law, not ideology and politics. Often in sharp contrast to other political institutions (such as legislatures), courts are respected—indeed often revered—because their decisions are viewed as being principled rather than motivated by self-interest or partisanship. To the extent that courts are perceived as legitimate by their constituents, their decisions—even their unpopular ones—are respected, acquiesced to, and accepted.
The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, for example, often make reference to legitimacy as one of the institution’s most precious (and perhaps most volatile) resources. Justices have asserted that frequent reversals of existing precedents undermine the legitimacy of the judiciary. Others have argued that some issues are simply too politically sensitive for courts to intervene in (e.g., the president’s war-making powers). If courts become embroiled in ordinary political disputes and are seen as just another political actor trying to advance its ideology, interests, and preferences, then the legitimacy of the institution can be gravely damaged. Some have argued that just this kind of damage was done when the U.S. Supreme Court intervened in the 2000 presidential election and, ultimately, determined the winner. In general, judges are mindful of threats to the legitimacy of the courts and are unwilling to put it at risk in order to prevail in any particular political or legal controversy.
Courts are not naturally and universally endowed with legitimacy; rather, a sense of legitimacy is accrued and built over time. Throughout the world, the decisions of courts have often been ignored or violently opposed. In some countries, unpopular rulings have resulted in riots (Bulgaria); court buildings have been attacked and burned (Pakistan); judges have been intimidated and removed from office (Zimbabwe), assassinated (Uganda), or reassigned to courts in the hinterland (Japan); courts have been stripped of their jurisdiction (United States); and, in the most extreme cases, judicial institutions have been suspended (United States) or abolished (Russia).
Exclusive academic rate for students! Save 67% on Britannica Premium.
Learn More
The primary function of any court system—to help keep domestic peace—is so obvious that it is rarely considered or mentioned. If there were no institution that was accepted by the citizens of a society as an impartial and authoritative judge of whether a person had committed a crime and, if so, what type of punishment should be meted out, vigilante...
Learn about the role and operation of courts in different legal systems, such as common law and civil law. Explore the concept of judicial legitimacy and the challenges courts face in maintaining it.
Learn the meaning and usage of the word court as a noun and a verb in British and American English. Find synonyms, pronunciation, collocations, and related expressions for court.
Court can mean a place where justice is administered, a residence of a sovereign or dignitary, a formal assembly, or a place to play sports. It can also be a verb meaning to seek someone's favor or attention, or to invite risks.
Trial Courts: They are first instance where evidence is presented, and facts are determined. Examples include Magistrates, Municipal, and District Courts. Appellate Courts: They review the decisions of first instance courts for legal errors. Examples include Circuit Courts of Appeal in the US or the Court of Appeal in the UK.
A court is a government institution that adjudicates legal disputes and carries out the administration of justice. Learn about the etymology, jurisdiction, and differences between civil law and common law courts, as well as court television shows.
