Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. In too many communities, the fairness, reliability, and integrity of the legal system have been compromised by clear evidence of racial bias in the selection of juries. 1 See Equal Justice Initiative, Illegal Racial Discrimination in Jury Selection: A Continuing Legacy (June 2010).

  2. We uncovered shocking, present-day evidence of racial discrimination in jury selection, including: Racially biased use of peremptory strikes and illegal racial discrimination in jury selection remains widespread, particularly in serious criminal cases and capital cases.

  3. The report documents the country’s long history of tolerating racial bias in jury selection and a continuing indifference to correcting widespread underrepresentation of people of color on juries. Race-based discrimination in jury selection was outlawed nearly 150 years ago.

  4. Dec 4, 2018 · Racial bias largely seeps in through what are called “peremptory” challenges: the ability of a prosecutor — and then a defense attorney — to block a certain number of potential jurors without...

  5. Racial bias in jury selection has been widely documented in the literature, with much attention on consequences for defendants of color. The current research expanded this focus by investigating how jurors might be impacted by witnessing racial bias during jury selection.

  6. Today, racial bias in jury selection—and the resulting all-white (or nearly all-white) jury—has endured in part through the use of peremptory challenges against prospective Black jurors. The jury selection process provides two ways to strike prospective jurors: (1) for-cause challenges and (2) peremptory challenges.

  7. People also ask

  8. Jul 27, 2023 · In a first-of-its-kind study, researchers used natural language processing (NLP) tools to analyze transcripts of the jury selection process. They found multiple quantifiable differences in how prosecutors questioned Black and white members of the jury pool.