Search results
provide somebody with something. In the first, the material provided is the object, in the second the recipient is the object. Both are valid, and both are in common use. The difference between them is the with phrase, which must be there to get meaning 2: if there is only one (direct) object, then meaning 1 is the relevant one (the to phrase ...
Mar 28, 2019 · "Provide for the common good" is an example of "provide" without an A and a B, by the way. You can "provide for" something, or "provision" something, or "provide" something to someone. Share
Nov 5, 2014 · So the consensus here is that both "provide someone with something" and "provide someone something" are correct, with the former being more common. However, I know there are at least two dictionaries that state that the one without "with" is wrong. The first one is Longman, and the second one is Macmillan, whose online version has been ...
20. It appears the transitive verb provide has (at least) two prepositions: provide (something) for (someone/something) provide (something) to (someone/something) For example, The umbrellas provide shade for the guests. He provided drugs to the prisoners. In both of these examples, one could have swapped to and for, although the sentences as ...
• present or yield (something useful) : neither will provide answers to these problems. 2 [ intrans. ] ( provide for) make adequate preparation for (a possible event) : new qualifications must provide for changes in technology. • supply sufficient money to ensure the maintenance of (someone) : Emma was handsomely provided for in Frank's will.
Mar 29, 2017 · provide (Collins COBUILD English Usage) 'provide with'*. To provide something that someone needs or wants means to give it to them or make it available to them. You say that you provide someone with something. They provided him with money to buy new clothes. We can provide you with information that may help you to find a job.
Feb 5, 2015 · Senior Member. Korean. Sep 7, 2016. #10. Vanessa Rocha said: The reason teachers insist that only "for" is correct is that "providing something for someone" is a fixed expression, and in terms of form "providing something" colligates with "for someone", and not "to someone". It's a matter of "word grammar".
May 31, 2008 · v. tr. To make available; afford: a room that provides ample sunlight through French windows. To set down as a stipulation: an agreement that provides deadlines for completion of the work. Ergo... "The Allans provided a good education to Poe". My dictionaries only list : provide somebody with something; provide something for somebody.
I'm always wondering when I want to write a sentence with provide. What is the correct way to say/write. to provide someone with something. to provide someone something. to provide something to someone. I'm dubious about 2. only, 1. and 3. seem OK to me.
Apr 2, 2016 · Apr 3, 2016. #5. The general distinction, Gandalf, is that "provide something to someone" says that it's provided directly to the person concerned. Whereas with "provide something for someone", it might be provided to an intermediary. For example, a food-product company may provide a range of foods for vegetarians, but they provide the products ...
