Search results
Nov 12, 2013 · Lalita Kumari vs Govt.Of U.P.& Ors on 12 November, 2013. Warning on translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. Select the following parts of the judgment. Facts. Issues. Petitioner's Arguments.
Apr 23, 2024 · The Hon’ble Supreme Court in this case (Lalita Kumari v. Govt of UP) ruled that Section 154(1) of the CrPC mandates a police officer to register an FIR if any information received by or conveyed to such officer discloses the commission of any cognizable offence.
Apr 16, 2020 · Supreme Court of India. • Bench: P. Sathasivam, B.S. Chauhan, Ranjana Prakash Desai, Ranjan Gogoi, S.A. Bobde. • Parties: Petitioner: Lalita Kumari. Respondents: Govt. of U.P. and Others. • Brief facts: The petitioner, a minor girl was kidnapped by local goons. Her father, Bhola Kamat went to police station to lodge an FIR which police refused.
The present writ petition has been filed in the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution by Lalita Kumari (minor) through her father for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or directions of like nature for the protection of his daughter who has been kidnapped.
May 8, 2024 · This petition was filed before the Supreme Court by Lalita kumari who is minor through her father under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, 1950(COI) for the issuance of writ of Habeas Corpus for the protection of his minor daughter who has been kidnapped.
Jun 3, 2020 · BRIEF FACTS OF LALITA KUMARI V GOVT. OF U.P. In this matter issue was that a police officer is bound to register a First information report after receiving any information relating to the commission of a Cognizable offense Section 154 of CRPC.
The police did not take any action to trace Lalita Kumari even after registering an FIR against the private respondents. The Supreme Court passed an order expressing its concern on non-registration of the FIR even in a case of cognizable offence.
