Search results
Dec 1, 2021 · FACTS. In 1934, the plaintiff (Mr. Gajanan Moreshwar Parelkar) and the BMC had a lease agreement for a period of 999 years, whereby BMC gave the plaintiff a particular piece of land in exchange for the lease amount. The defendant (Mr. Moreshwar Madan Mantri) then asked the plaintiff to transfer the benefit of that lease to him.
On July 29, 1939, the plaintiff at the request of the defendant wrote a letter to the Bombay Municipality asking them to transfer the plot of land to the name of the defendant. The transfer was duly sanctioned by the Improvement Committee of the Bombay Municipality on August 26, 1939.
ANALYSIS OF GAJANAN MORESHWAR PARELKAR V. MORESHWAR MADAN MANTRI (1942) 44 BOMLR. 703 & INSIGHT ON THE COMMENCEMENT OF LIABILITY UNDER THE CONTRACT OF INDEMNITY Mr. Parthik Choudhury, B.B.A. LL.B., Army Law College, Pune, Maharashtra-412106 ABSTRACT Contract act was usually formulated and implemented by the British in India,
Gajanan Moreshwar v. Moreshwar Madan (1942) 44 BOMLR 703 (Section 124 of Indian Contract Act, when indemnity can be claimed) FACTS: Plaintiff (P) got a plot of land on lease from municipal corp. of Mumbai. P allowed Defendant (D) to erect building on that land. D, in this course, incurred debt of Rs.5ooo from building material supplier (K), twice.
Jan 8, 2024 · Gajanan Moreshwar Parelkar vs Moreshwar Madan Mantri on 1 April, 1942. Facts: 1. The plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Municipal Corporation for the City of Bombay in 1934 to lease a plot of land (No. 226A of the Dadar Matunga Estate) for 999 years. 2.
The landmark case of Gajanan Moreshwar Parelkar vs. Moreshwar Madan Mantri established that a liability on the indemnity-holder that is certain and absolute would obligate the indemnifier to clear it off. 2682 New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs Kusumanchi Kameshwra Rao & Others2683,
This case analysis discusses the 1942 case Gajanan Moreshwar Parelkar v. Moreshwar Madan Mantri. It involves a dispute over land that was mortgaged multiple times by the plaintiff at the request of the defendant to pay suppliers.
