Search results
Also, the State Government is competent to direct the Inspector General, Vigilance to take over the investigation of a cognizable offence registered at a police station vide State of Bihar vs. A.C. Saldanna (supra).
Dec 27, 2023 · This case is a landmark judgement on the powers of magistrate to direct investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). Appellant is the father of a Major in the Indian Army named Ravishankar. The Major's body was discovered on 23 rd August 2003, at Mathura Railway Station.
Mar 16, 2024 · This article seeks to analyse, through the case of Sakiri Vasu v. State of U.P., the role and power of the police under Section 154 of the CrPC and the power of the Magistrate to oversee the investigation under Section 156 of the CrPC in detail.
Get free access to the complete judgment in Sakiri Vasu v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others on CaseMine.
Sakiri Vasu v. State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others1 in which it has been inter alia held as under: “11. In this connection we would like to state that if a person has a grievance that the police station is not registering his FIR under Section 154 CrPC, then he can approach the Superintendent of Police under Section 154(3) CrPC by an ...
Jul 26, 2021 · In this case, a writ petition was filed by the appellant who is the father of an army officer whose dead body was found on the railway tracks of the Mathura Railway Station.
Dec 7, 2007 · The case of Sakiri Vasu vs State of UP, decided on December 7, 2007, by the Supreme Court of India, shines a spotlight on the judiciary's role in ensuring that police procedures are conducted fairly and efficiently. At its core, the case revolves around the substantial question: What happens when the police fail to act on a legitimate complaint?
Feb 25, 2023 · Sakiri Vasu vs. State of U.P. and others is a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India that laid down important principles with respect to the powers of a judicial magistrate under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC), Section 156 (3) – The power in the Magistrate to order further investigation u/s 156 (3) is an independent power, and does not affect the power of the investigating officer to further investigate the case even after submission of his report vide Section 173 (8).
In this connection we would like to state that if a person has a grievance that the police station is not registering his FIR under Section 154 Cr.P.C., then he can approach the Superintendent of Police under Section 154 Cr.P.C. by an application in writing.
