Search results
I have searched for the full form of "OOPS" in Google, but unfortunately, there are many ambiguous answers. Some say it's "Systems", and some say it's "Structure", and some have even mentioned it as "Synopsis". Can anybody please enlighten me, to find the full form of OOPS, with some proper & correct reference? Many thanks to everyone, helping ...
Feb 19, 2014 · The implementation of OOP varies throughout programming languages - but the pillars (Abstraction, Inheritance, Encapsulation, and Polymorphism) of OOP are usually present in some way or form. I will say without preference to either language, that Java pushes the semantics a little harder on the programmer than say Python. For example,
Message passing simply means that (at a very abstract level) the fundamental mechanism of program execution is objects sending each other messages. The important point is that the name and structure of these messages is not necessarily fixed beforehand in the source code and can itself be additional information.
Jun 18, 2013 · Java libraries (e.g. all the nice open-source toolsets) are usually platform-independent, as long as they are written in pure Java. Most libraries try to stick with pure Java in order to maintain platform independence, but there are some cases where this is not possible (e.g. if the library needs to interface directly with a special hardware or call a C/C++ library that uses native code).
There's two kinds of wizards. There's the guy who makes specific things happen with magic words. He's got a word for summoning fire. He's got a word for making a frozen chicken appear out of thin air. And another word for creating a pot of force (I prefer my force green, glowy, and translucent) full of friolating goodness.
Composition is again a specialized form of Aggregation and we can call this as a “death” relationship. It is a strong type of Aggregation. Child object does not have their lifecycle and if parent object deletes all child object will also be deleted. Let’s take again an example of relationship between House and rooms.
23. Java is a generally good OOP language. Sure it has fallen out of grace of the hipster hackers, but it is still one of the most used languages for OOP programming in the corporate world. It's OOP principles are solid and you can draw valid comparisons between its design choices and other popular OOP languages like C++ and C# without any ...
May 18, 2015 · The simplest way to avoid setters is to hand the values to the constructor method when you new up the object. This is also the usual pattern when you want to make an object immutable. That said, things are not always that clear in the real world. It is true that methods should be about behavior.
Java, on the other hand, has one kernel data structure (Array, according to "The Java Pocket Guide), but in general use, you can't get much done in Java without importing collections. Once you do that, you have access to a 'rich' (in which sense I mean immensely complex) type library with which to get the same functionality you had with Python's list.
Java is designed in a very OO approach, and somewhat even 'forces' programmers to program within the OO paradigm (which can be considered good or bad, a matter of opinion). However while almost everything in Java is a class or an object, primitive data types (int, double, etc) are not. While I see no advantages to this, there are disadvantages.
