Search results
Supreme Court of India. Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma on 11 August, 2020. Equivalent citations: AIR 2020 SUPREME COURT 3717, AIRONLINE 2020 SC 676. Author: Arun Mishra. Bench: M.R. Shah, S. Abdul Nazeer, Arun Mishra.
Oct 1, 2020 · To know more about the Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma & Others, along with 7 other matters in brief, please refer to the video below: After the amendment Act of 2005, a Division bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Prakash & Others Vs.
Both judgements passed earlier were dictated by a divisional bench constituted of two judges. So in Vineeta sharma v. Rakesh Sharma a three judge constitutional bench was setup to resolve the issues and give the correct interpretation of section 6 of the amended Hindu Succession Act, 2005.
Jan 13, 2022 · One of the most welcomed and awaited verdicts on the rights of women, especially as daughters in the property of the family by birth, had arrived in a famous case of Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, which was also part of various Special leave petitions dealt with that major issue.
Jul 27, 2021 · The verdict of Vineeta Sharma has cleared the uncertainty about the law & made it clear that the amendment of the Hindu Succession Act, granting equal right to inherit the ancestral property to daughters would have a retrospective effect.
In a significant and groundbreaking verdict, the Supreme Court delivered a momentous judgment on August 11th, 2020, in the case of Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, effectively dismantling male chauvinism prevalent in the division of Hindu ancestral property.
Apr 16, 2021 · DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11th August 2020. JUDGES: Justice Arun Mishra, Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, Justice M. R. Shah. PARTIES. SUMMARY: Daughters weren't having coparcenary rights and will only directly inherit the property of the father and had no right to inherit the ancestral property of the joint Hindu family by birth.
Aug 24, 2020 · A summary of Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, in which the Supreme Court held that daughters would have equal coparcenery rights in Hindu Undivided Family property.
May 15, 2018 · CaseIQ. (AI Recommendations) VINEETA SHARMA v. RAKESH SHARMA. Smart Summary (Beta) Leave granted. The captioned appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 15.05.2018 in R.F.A No.301 of 2017 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. In view of the conflict between two, Two Judge Bench decisions of this Court vis. Prakash v.
Dec 5, 2018 · Get free access to the complete judgment in Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma . on CaseMine.
