Search results
May 27, 2019 · This article analyzes the case of Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975), the case that shook the entire nation and led to emergency. The case of Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain was a landmark judgment for many reasons. It was the first time in the history of independent India that a Prime Minister’s election was set aside.
Aug 22, 2018 · Indira Nehru Gandhi Vs. Raj Narain – Case Summary. By. Hemant Varshney - August 22, 2018. 0. ... Therefore, this 39 th Amendment was challenged in the Supreme Court in Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain. Issue. Constitutional validity of 39 th Constitutional (Amendment) Act, 1975. Respondent’s Arguments. The respondent argued that the said amendment is violative of basic features of Constitution.
Feb 7, 2022 · Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain case (1975) Main Theme: The doctrine of the basic structure of the constitution was reaffirmed and applied by the Supreme Court in the Indira Nehru Gandhi case (1975). In this case, the Supreme Court invalidated a provision of the 39 th Amendment Act (1975) which kept the election disputes involving the Prime Minister and the Speaker of Lok Sabha outside the jurisdiction of all courts.
Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Shri Raj Narain & Anr on 7 November, 1975 Equivalent citations: AIR 1975 SUPREME COURT 2299, 1976 2 SCR 347 Bench: H.R. Khanna, K.K. Mathew, M.H. Beg, Y.V. Chandrachud ... The case of Powell v. McCormack (supra) is also one of disqualification by the House of a Congressman on the basis of qualification which the House added to those specified in the Constitution. In other words, the House purported to unseat a member by disqualifying him on a ground not given in the ...
The decision in the Indira Gandhi vs Raj Narain case was a brave one taken by the judiciary to put the greedy' Parliament in its place in the Constitution. It was showed to the Parliament that they are not the only one in the democracy and judiciary will always be there to uphold the Constitution from the harmful acts of the Parliament. However, even though the judgment was theoretically right, it was in many ways flawed on the grounds of justice, equity and good conscience. ...
Oct 7, 2023 · The Indira Gandhi vs Raj Narain case involved allegations of election malpractice against Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in the 1971 Lok Sabha elections. Raj Narain contested the election’s validity, claiming that Gandhi exceeded campaign expenditure limits and that a government officer, Yashpal Kapur, improperly assisted her.
In the landmark case of Indra Gandhi v Raj Narain[1], elections of Indra Gandhi were challenged for following false practices during elections. This case was a landmark judgment. For the first time the doctrine of basic structure was used, given in Kesavananda Bhartiya v State of Kerala. ... Therefore, in the case Indira Gandhi v Raj Narayan, the constitutional validity of her elections and the 39th amendment along with the certain other amendments made during this period to favour her was ...
Jan 2, 2020 · Election disputes involving Prime Minister and validity of the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act in Indira Nehru Gandhi v Raj Narain. CITATION: AIR 1975 SC 2299: (1975) Supp SCC 1: (1976) SCR JUDGES: A.N Ray, C.J, H.R Khanna, K.K Mathew, M.H Beg and Y.V Chandrachud, J.J DATE OF DECISION : 7/11/1975 TOPIC: Election disputes involving Prime Minister and validity of the 39th Constitutional Amendment Act Facts of Indira Nehru Gandhi v.
Indira Nehru Gandhi (Smt.) vs Raj Narain & Anr on 24 June, 1975 Equivalent citations: 1975 AIR 1590, 1975 SCC (2) 159, AIR 1975 SUPREME COURT 1590, 1975 2 SCC 159 Author: V.R. Krishnaiyer Bench: V.R. Krishnaiyer PETITIONER: INDIRA NEHRU GANDHI (SMT.) Vs. RESPONDENT: RAJ NARAIN & ANR. ... In an election case, the whole constituency is, in an invisible but real sense, before the court and justice to the electoral system which is the paramount consideration is ,best done by safeguarding the ...
Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Raj Narain & Anr. & Vice Versa on 19 December, 1975 Equivalent citations: AIR 1977 SUPREME COURT 69, 1976 3 SCC 321 Bench: H.R. Khanna, K.K. Mathew, M.H. Beg, Y.V. Chandrachud CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 887 of 1975 PETITIONER: INDIRA NEHRU GANDHI RESPONDENT: RAJ NARAIN & ANR. ... My own recollection of the hearing of the case is that merits, including broad questions of fact, were sufficiently, gone into to enable us to deal with all questions of law emerging out of ...
