Travis Marks
Search results
Common law courts look to the past decisions of courts to synthesize the legal principles of past cases. Stare decisis, the principle that cases should be decided according to consistent principled rules so that similar facts will yield similar results, lies at the heart of all common law systems. [5]
- Overview
- The origin of the common law
- GeneratedCaptionsTabForHeroSec
common law, the body of customary law, based upon judicial decisions and embodied in reports of decided cases, that has been administered by the common-law courts of England since the Middle Ages. From it has evolved the type of legal system now found also in the United States and in most of the member states of the Commonwealth (formerly the Briti...
The English common law originated in the early Middle Ages in the King’s Court (Curia Regis), a single royal court set up for most of the country at Westminster, near London. Like many other early legal systems, it did not originally consist of substantive rights but rather of procedural remedies. The working out of these remedies has, over time, produced the modern system in which rights are seen as primary over procedure. Until the late 19th century, English common law continued to be developed primarily by judges rather than legislators.
The common law of England was largely created in the period after the Norman Conquest of 1066. The Anglo-Saxons, especially after the accession of Alfred the Great (871), had developed a body of rules resembling those being used by the Germanic peoples of northern Europe. Local customs governed most matters, while the church played a large part in government. Crimes were treated as wrongs for which compensation was made to the victim.
The Norman Conquest did not bring an immediate end to Anglo-Saxon law, but a period of colonial rule by the mainly Norman conquerors produced change. Land was allocated to feudal vassals of the king, many of whom had joined the conquest with this reward in mind. Serious wrongs were regarded mainly as public crimes rather than as personal matters, and the perpetrators were punished by death and forfeiture of property. The requirement that, in cases of sudden death, the local community should identify the body as English (“presentment of Englishry”)—and, therefore, of little account—or face heavy fines reveals a state of unrest between the Norman conquerors and their English subjects. Government was centralized, a bureaucracy built up, and written records maintained. Controversy exists regarding the extent to which the efficient government of the Anglo-Norman realm was due to the legacy of Anglo-Saxon institutions or to the ruthlessness of the Norman invaders. Elements of the Anglo-Saxon system that survived were the jury, ordeals (trials by physical test or combat), the practice of outlawry (putting a person beyond the protection of the law), and writs (orders requiring a person to appear before a court; see below The development of a centralized judiciary). Important consolidation occurred during the reign of Henry II (1154–89). Royal officials roamed the country, inquiring about the administration of justice. Church and state were separate and had their own law and court systems. This led to centuries of rivalry over jurisdiction, especially since appeals from church courts, before the Reformation, could be taken to Rome.
The Normans spoke French and had developed a customary law in Normandy. They had no professional lawyers or judges; instead, literate clergymen acted as administrators. Some of the clergy were familiar with Roman law and the canon law of the Christian church, which was developed in the universities of the 12th century. Canon law was applied in the English church courts, but the revived Roman law was less influential in England than elsewhere, despite Norman dominance in government. This was due largely to the early sophistication of the Anglo-Norman system. Norman custom was not simply transplanted to England; upon its arrival, a new body of rules, based on local conditions, emerged.
Common law is the customary law based on judicial decisions and reports of decided cases in England and its former colonies. Learn about its history, contrast with civil law and equity, and influence of human rights and EU law.
Oct 15, 2015 · While the term common law is used to refer to principles applied to court decisions, a common law system refers to a legal system that places great weight on judicial decisions made in prior similar cases. In the United States, common law, or precedent, is used to help ensure similar results in similar cases.
Feb 12, 2024 · Common law is a system of unwritten laws based on court decisions and legal precedents. Learn how common law works, how it differs from civil law, and what are some examples of common law in the U.S. and abroad.
Apr 23, 2015 · Common law is an unwritten, judge-made law derived from judicial decisions and customs. Learn how common law originated in England and how it was introduced and adapted in India by the British colonial rule.
Nov 15, 2022 · The simplest definition for common law is that it’s a “body of law” based on court decisions rather than codes or statutes. But in reality, common law is often more complicated than that. At the center of common law is a legal principle known as stare decisis, which is a Latin phrase that roughly means “to stand by things decided.”
People also ask
What is common law based on?
What is a common law system?
How does common law affect decision-making?
What is a common law precedent?
Learn about the common-law system, based on custom and general principles, and its application in England and the U.S. Find out the history and key figures of common law, such as Sir Matthew Hale and Oliver Wendell Holmes.
