Yahoo India Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics
  2. Prime Members Can Enjoy Unlimited Free Shipping, Early Access To Lightning Deals and More. Enhance Your Shopping Experience With Our Personalised Recommendations.

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics is a book by the American scholar John Mearsheimer on the subject of international relations theory published by W.W. Norton & Company in 2001. Mearsheimer explains and argues for his theory of " offensive realism " by stating its key assumptions, evolution from early realist theory , and its predictive ...

    • John J. Mearsheimer
    • 2001
  3. Jan 18, 2020 · for peace will probably not be realized, because the great powers that shape the international system fear each other and compete for power as a result. Indeed, their ultimate aim is to gain a position of dominant power over others. because having dominant power is the best means to ensure one's own survival.

  4. In clear, eloquent prose, John Mearsheimer explains why the answer is no: a rising China will seek to dominate Asia, while the United States, determined to remain the world's sole...

  5. Apr 7, 2014 · The Tragedy of Great Power Politics is an accessible history of great power behavior since the 18th century. John Mearsheimer is a professor at the University of Chicago. Mearsheimer believes that once countries become economically strong they seek to dominate their region militarily.

    • 2001
    • John J. Mearsheimer
  6. 'A superb book.…Mearsheimer has made a significant contribution to our understanding of the behavior of great powers.'—Barry R. Posen, The National Interest , The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, John J Mearsheimer, 9780393349276

  7. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. John J. Mearsheimer. W. W. Norton & Company, 2001 - Political Science - 555 pages. As the Cold War fades, leaders and theorists alike speak of a new era,...

  8. Mearsheimer argues that great powers are driven by the fear of being dominated and the desire to dominate others, leading to perpetual security competition and war. He explains how the structure of the international system forces states to act aggressively and how the end of the Cold War did not bring peace.