Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4270 OF 2008. ARISING OUT OF. SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 17005 OF 2006. K.D. SHARMA ... APPELLANT. VERSUS. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA. LTD. & ORS. ... RESPONDENT. J U D G M E N T. C.K. THAKKER, J. 1. Leave granted. 2.

  2. Dec 11, 2021 · K.D. Sharma v. Steel Authority of India Limited, (2008)12 SCC 481. If there is no candid disclosure of relevant and material facts or the petitioner is guilty of misleading the court, his petition may be dismissed at the threshold without considering the merits of the claim. Ruling

  3. Oct 22, 2022 · JUDGMENT. [Landmark Judgement] KD Sharma v/s SAIL (2008) Oct22,2022 # Article 226 # Article 32 # Constitution of India # Justice CK Thakker # Justice DK Jain # SUPREME COURT # Writ Jurisdiction. Published on: 22 October 2022 at 21:18 IST. Court – Supreme Court of India. Citation – KD Sharma v/s SAIL (2008) 12 SCC 481.

    • Facts
    • Issues
    • Arguments
    • Analysis
    • Conclusion

    The present appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 16-2-2005 in Miscellaneous Cases Nos. 9 and 10 of 2005 and Miscellaneous Case No. 57 of 2004 in Review Petition No. 4 of 2002 passed by the High Court of Orissa. Shortly stated, the facts of the case are that Respondent 1, Steel Authority of India Ltd. (“SAIL”, for short) issued tenders ...

    Whether the appellant was deceived or cheated by SAIL or anyone else?
    Whether the appellant has approached the Court with clean hands by disclosing all facts?
    Whether the appellant is entitled to any relief?

    The learned counsel for Respondent 1 SAIL strongly refuted the allegations levelled by the appellant. The counsel for SAIL further stated that the appellant has not been affected at all. The counsel, therefore, submitted that the appeal should be dismissed by this Court. It was, therefore, not open to the appellant thereafter to turn round and make...

    The Court defined “fraud” as an act of deliberate deception with the design of securing something by taking unfair advantage of another. Fraud is thus an extrinsic collateral act which vitiates all judicial acts, whether in rem or in personam. It, therefore, cannot be said that the appellant was deceived or cheated, either by SAIL or by anyone else...

    For the foregoing reasons, the appeal deserves to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed with costs.

  4. Sep 3, 2023 · While patrolling, the party was ambushed by terrorists using automatic weapons. Shaheed L/Nk K. D. Sharma led the counter-attack. He engaged the terrorists compelling them to retreat and saved lives of his fellow troopers. In this encounter Shaheed L/Nk K. D. Sharma suffered fatal bullet injuries.

  5. 19,189. Reads. 806. Citations. Introduction. KD Sharma currently works as Dean Postgraduate Studies. He worked at the Crop Physiology Lab, Department of Agronomy and Department of Plant...

  6. Krishna Dayal Sharma (6 September 1931 – 15 April 2010) was an Indian ambassador to Pakistan. He also served as the Indian High Commissioner in Mauritius, Tanzania and Australia. His final ambassadorial role was as head of mission in Madrid, Spain, from 1985-to 89.