Search results
Jun 16, 2022 · Sunil Kumar vs Ram Prakash case held that a coparcener does not have the right to get a permanent injunction against the Karta to prevent him from alienating joint family property.
Brief summary: The defendant-Respondent 1, Ram Parkash as Karta of Joint Hindu family executed an agreement to sell the suit property bearing M.C.K No. 238/9, in Mohalla Qanungaon at Kaithal for a consideration of Rs 21,400 and received a sum of Rs 5000 as earnest money.
Sushil Kumar & Anr vs Ram Prakash & Ors on 13 January, 1988. Warning on Translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. Select the following parts of the judgment. Issues. Respondent's Arguments. Analysis of the law.
Sunil Perkash Biography: Get to know all about Sunil Perkash, his personal life, love interests, wife, family, net worth, and career only on Filmibeat.
- January 1, 1970
Apr 18, 2024 · Sunil Kumar v. Ram Parkash (1988) 2 SCC 77. Judge: Ray, Jagannatha Shetty. Facts. On February 1978, Ram Parkash entered into an agreement for sale of certain house property in favour of Jai Bhagwan. Property was described as self acquired property of Ram Prakash. Later, Ram Prakash did not execute the sale deed though called upon to do so.
Sunil Kumar v. Ram Parkash (1988) 2 SCC 77 Family Law-II PSDA Submitted by KANISHKA Enrollment No-Semester-Section-B ##### Vivekananda School of Law and Legal Studies Introduction. − Alienation means transfer of property, such as gifts, sales and mortgages.
People also ask
Who is Sunil Kumar V Ram Parkash?
What is alienation in Sunil Kumar V Ram Parkash?
What is Sunil Kumar vs Ram Prakash case?
How much did Jai Bhagwan pay for Ram Parkash's property?
1,183 Followers, 853 Following, 144 Posts - Sunil perkash (@sunilperkash) on Instagram: "Film Producer. Storyteller. Enchanted. Salt. Disenchanted. Last Survivors."
