Search results
Jan 11, 2022 · The test handed down in the R.G. Anand case is the ultimate and all-encompassing test for copyright infringements involving films that are similar to original films in order to prove the levels of plagiarism or likeness. The Supreme Court’s decisions in the case of Shree Ventakesh Films (SVF) v. VipulAmrutlal Shah (2009) and MRF Limited v.
In Re. R.G. Films Ltd. (1953) 1 All E.R. 615. An American company produced a film in India technically in the name of a British Company, 90% of whose capital was held by the President of the American company which financed the production of the film.
By Ankit Rastogi August 18, 2015. R.G. Anand v. Delux Films and Ors. AIR 1978 SC 1613. Brief Facts of the Case: The Appellant, R. G. Anand, was an architect by profession and a playwright, dramatist and producer as well. He had wrote and produced a play called ‘Hum Hindustani’ in 1953 which received huge success and was re-staged numerous ...
Jan 11, 2022 · The test handed down in the R.G. Anand case is the ultimate and all-encompassing test for copyright infringements involving films that are similar to original films in order to prove the levels of plagiarism or likeness. The Supreme Court's decisions in the case of Shree Ventakesh Films (SVF) v.
May 1, 2024 · The RG Anand vs Delux Films case is a landmark case in Indian copyright law as it highlighted the importance of protecting the underlying ideas and expressions in creative works. The case established the principle that copyright infringement can occur even if there is not an exact word-for-word copy but a substantial similarity in the expression.
Oct 3, 2018 · In Re: R.G Films Ltd., identified the agency argument. In this case, an American production company decided to produce a film in India under the banner of a British Company. When application was made for its certification as a British production film, the application was rejected.
Jan 11, 2021 · Invocation of the principal of agency: RG Films Ltd (1953) An American company financed the production of a film in India in the name of a Britain company. 90% of the shares in the British Company was held by the president of an American Company. The company had no business other than its registered office and it had no staff also.
