Search results
Jan 4, 2002 · The Federalist No. 57 1 ByJames MadisonorAlexander Hamilton. [New York, February 19, 1788] To the People of the State of New-York. THE third charge against the House of Representatives is, that it will be taken from that class of citizens which will have least sympathy with the mass of the people, and be most likely to aim at an ambitious ...
Jan 4, 2002 · In the McLean description begins The Federalist: A Collection of Essays, Written in Favour of the New Constitution, As Agreed upon by the Federal Convention, September 17, 1787. In Two Volumes (New York: Printed and Sold by J. and A. McLean, 1788). description ends edition this essay is numbered 51, in the newspapers it is numbered 50. 1 .
Jan 4, 2002 · The Federalist No. 55 1 ByJames MadisonorAlexander Hamilton. [New York, February 13, 1788] To the People of the State of New-York. THE number of which the House of Representatives is to consist, forms another, and a very interesting point of view under which this branch of the federal legislature may be contemplated.
Jan 4, 2002 · The Federalist No. 83 1. [New York, May 28, 1788] To the People of the State of New-York. THE objection to the plan of the convention, which has met with most success in this state, and perhaps in several of the other states, 2 is that 3 relative to the want of a constitutional provision for the trial by jury in civil cases.
IN THE course of the foregoing review of the Constitution, I have taken notice of, and endeavored to answer most of the objections which have appeared against it. There, however, remain a few which either did not fall naturally under any particular head or were...
10. Separation of Powers. CHAPTER 10|Document 16. James Madison, Federalist, no. 51, 347--53. 6 Feb. 1788. To what expedient then shall we finally resort for maintaining in practice the necessary partition of power among the several departments, as laid down in the constitution? The only answer that can be given is, that as all these exterior ...
The Federalist Papers (1787–88) contributed to a vital political debate in the early American republic about the benefits and drawbacks of federalism for republican—or what today we call democratic—government.¹ Both then and now, Americans have understood federalism as the division of government and its powers across national and ...
