Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. VS. Exynos 1330. Snapdragon 695. We compared two 8-core processors: Samsung Exynos 1330 (with Mali-G68 MP2 graphics) and Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (Adreno 619). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. Review.

  2. Jun 25, 2024 · The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695-powered Moto G34 5G exhibits better performance in synthetic benchmarks, compared to the Samsung Exynos 1330 despite being almost three years old. So, a smartphone, powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 processor, should be your preference if you are looking for a performance-oriented smartphone. Let us compare the ...

  3. We have presented the Antutu scores for almost all phones that are equipped with the Snapdragon 695 5G, excluding 2-3 smartphones. In the future, we will make an effort to update scores for the remaining phones as well. We hope to have addressed your query satisfactorily. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 Specifications

  4. The clock speed of the graphics processing unit (GPU). has 5G support. MediaTek Dimensity 6020. Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G. The fifth-generation wireless technology delivers higher speeds and lower latency than the previous, fourth-generation tech. GPU turbo. Unknown. Help us by suggesting a value.

  5. May 30, 2023 · We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (Adreno 710). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.

  6. Dec 29, 2023 · The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G has 8 cores with 8 threads and is based on the 9. gen of the Qualcomm Snapdragon series. The processor was released in Q1/2022. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G scores 669 points in the Geekbench 5 single-core benchmark. In the Geekbench 5 multi-core benchmark, the result is 1,928 points.

  7. Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. Higher GPU frequency (~15%) Performs 15% better in floating-point computations. 10% higher CPU clock speed (2200 vs 2000 MHz) Shows better (up to 6%) AnTuTu 10 score – 439K vs 414K.