Search results
Mar 27, 2018 · The appellant is a public company with majority of shares held by the Government of West Bengal. The respondent, which is holder of 28.54 per cent of the shares purchased 100 shares, which together would make its holding 39.77 per cent, sought registration of the shares.
Sarkar & Chowdhury Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. _____ Respondent Civil Appeal No. 10807 of 2016 [Arising out of SLP (C) No. 29122 of 2016], decided on November 11, 2016 The Judgement of the Court was delivered by
Mar 27, 2018 · Mackintosh Burn Ltd. v. Sarkar And Chowdhury Enterprises Private Limited . Smart Summary (Beta) Summary: The appellant sought registration of the shares, but no orders were passed. The respondent approached the Company Law Board, Kolkata Bench, Kolkata.
Sarkar and Chowdhury Enterprises Pvt Ltd. Mackintosh Burn Limited v. Sarkar and Chowdhury Enterprises Private Limited. Citation: (2018) 5 SCC 575. Facts: The Mackintosh Case involved an unlisted public company, which had refused to register a transfer of shares to its competitor.
Case Details. Filing Number. 1908134000182014. Filing Date. 08-02-2018. Party Name. SARKAR & CHOWDHURY ENTERPRISES PVT LTD VS MACKINTOSH BURN LTD & ORS. Petitioner Advocate (s) Choudhury Law Offices.
Case Details. Filing Number. 1908134030572020. Filing Date. 01-01-2020. Party Name. SARKAR & CHOWDHURY ENTERPRISES PVT LTD VS MACKINTOSH BURN LTD & ORS. Petitioner Advocate (s) A N Bhattacharyya.
Mackintosh Burn Ltd vs Sarkar & Chowdhury on 10 January, 2020 NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI Company Appeal (AT) No. 02 of 2020 IN THE MATTER OF: Mackintosh Burn Ltd. ...Appellant Versus M/s.
