Search results
Sanjay Dutt vs State Through C.B.I. Bombay on 9 September, 1994. Bench: A.M. Ahmadi, J.S. Verma, P.B. Sawant, B.P. Jeevan Reddy, N.P. Singh. CASE NO.: Special Leave Petition (crl.) 1834-35 of 1994.
- State of Madhya Pradesh V. M/s Azad Bharat Finance Co. and Anr
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 28/07/1966 BENCH: SIKRI, S.M. BENCH:...
- Deepa Singh vs State Of Punjab on 15 January, 2013
State of Maharashtra 2001(5) B.C.R. 577 and Sanjay Dutt v....
- Ram Narayan Singh V. The State of Delhi and Others
Ram Narayan Singh vs The State Of Delhi And Others on 12...
- Popcorn Entertainment ... vs The City Industrial Development on 1 September, 2009
Even CIDCO in their affidavit filed in the case of Sanjay...
- State of Madhya Pradesh V. M/s Azad Bharat Finance Co. and Anr
- Introduction
- Brief of The Case
- Facts of The Case
- Judgment
- Conclusion
The popular entertainer Sanjay Dutt had served a prison season of 5 years in the wake of being condemned for detainment because of his supposed contribution to the 1993 Mumbai sequential shoot case by the C.B.I. otherwise called the Focal Department of Examination, Bombay. The Walk 19, 1993 Mumbai Impact case depended on a progression of 12 bomb im...
Recorded underneath are the principal realities of the Sanjay Dutt versus Statethrough the C.B.I Bombay case.The applicant, Sanjay Dutt was one of the 189 individuals who were accused in this specific case which was acquired under preliminary the Mumbai High Court in 1993.This case was with respect to the planned bomb impact which occurred on 12 Walk, 1993 in Bombay. An extremely impressive and significant bomb was shot into a vehicle in the storm cellar of the Bomb...As indicated by the C.B.I. Bombay’s documented charge sheet, which contained some extremely stunning proof reversed the situation for Mr. Dutt. As per the charge sheet, on 16 January 1993, it was d...Sanjay Dutt was accused of having one AK-56 rifle, one gun, and a couple of cartridges in the wake of giving the rest to his assistants. This was demonstrated after a couple of parts of the rifle,...It was later on uncovered that Sanjay’s accessories stubbornly annihilated the proof from the home of the solicitor according to the sets of Sanjay himself. Recorded beneath are the blamed who figu...Sanjay Dutt was charged with various offences which mainly incorporated enacting Section 5 in the TADA Act. (Terrorist Disruptive Activities Act)The petitioner was charged depending on the testimony of various eye and ear witnesses, a few unclear yet incriminating occurrences, and lastly a non-doctored confession of Sanjay Dutt himself.They can without much of a stretch become the justification behind death and are considered offenses under this demonstration. The punishments that fall under ‘punishment for terrorists’ are:
The usually known assertion ‘Lady Justice is blind’ probably won’t work constantly however there are situations where the courts have given equity and discipline to the meriting individuals. Sanjay Dutt, who is a Bollywood entertainer needed to confront a ton of prison time for his activities. He needed to confront prison time even subsequent to ha...
Oct 9, 2020 · Listed below are the extra details of the case of ‘Sanjay Dutt vs. State through C.B.I Bombay’. Case number: Special Leave Petition (Crl.) 1834-35 of 1994; Petitioner: Sanjay Dutt; Appeal: Criminal Miscellaneous Petition; Respondent: State through C.B.I Bombay; Bench: A.M Ahmadi, J.S Verma, P.B Sawant, B.P Jeevan Reddy, N.P SING
the Constitution Bench of this Court in Kartar Singh’s case (supra), the Designated Court should have directed release of the appellant on bail and there was no occasion to reject
Pursuant to the direction of the Constitution Bench contained in its judgment (1994) 5 SCC 410 dated 9-9-1994, the bail petition was posted before us on 21-9-1994. We heard Shri Kapil Sibal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Natarajan, learned counsel for the respondent fully.
The Court referred the matter to the Constitution Bench for decision on the issues raised by the petitioner. The Court did not grant the petitioner's request for interim bail. The case was deemed to be one that merits an expeditious hearing.
People also ask
What are the main facts of Sanjay Dutt Vs State?
Where can I find the complete judgment in Sanjay Dutt v State?
What happened in Sunjay Datt vs State?
Did the court pay off Sanjay Dutt?
It appears that a fresh application for bail was made before the Designated Court on 28-8-1995 primarily on the grounds: Pursuant to direction given by a Constitution Bench of this Court in the case of Kartar Singh v. State Of Punjab. Argument:
