Search results
The War on Poverty represents one of the most substantial government-led strategies to address poverty in the United States. As its leader, Sargent Shriver was tasked with creating policy and programs that would not just alleviate poverty, but provide a pathway towards eliminating it permanently.
Jan 7, 2014 · Shriver’s motto for the War on Poverty was “A hand up, not a hand out,” a principle that guided the formulation of policies and procedures in all its programs: Community Action, Job Corps, Head Start, Work Study, Neighborhood Heath Services, and Legal Services for the Poor, among others.
Sargent Shriver’s instrumental role as the director of the Office of Economic Opportunity during President Lyndon B. Johnson’s administration established him as a central figure in the design and execution of the ambitious War on Poverty initiative.
The National Clearinghouse for Legal Services (renamed the National Center on Poverty Law in 1995) was renamed the Shriver Center in 2002 and each year awards a Sargent Shriver Award for Equal Justice.
Feb 1, 2021 · After leading a poverty task force and creating the Office of Economic Opportunity, which managed the efforts, Shriver spearheaded the creation of multiple programs that addressed the root causes of poverty: lack of employment, education, legal resources, health care, community support, and more.
In late 1966, Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) Director (and Kennedy brother-in-law) Sargent Shriver contemplated resigning because of differences with the President over funding levels for the War on Poverty and frustration over perceptions that his effectiveness had diminished.
People also ask
How did Sargent Shriver solve the problem of poverty?
What was Shriver's plan for the war on poverty?
What does Shriver say about the war on poverty?
Who was Sargent Shriver?
The manner in which Shriver contextualized dissent and contestation in the speech, and the metaphors he used to frame the proper role of the citizen in the War on Poverty, extended beyond the specifics of the poverty program and reflected enduring tensions between citizen participation and representative democracy.
