Search results
May 24, 2018 · In terms of Section 126 (1) (b), the respondent would be entitled. 2. to maintain a petition both at the place where the husband is residing as also at the place where she is residing. Section 126 (1) does not contemplate a permanent place of residence.
Dec 13, 2016 · A son has no legal right in the self-acquired property of his parents, unless he has proof of contribution towards the acquisition of the property. He may be allowed to use the property on permission from his parents, but they are not obligated to allow him to live there.
Moreover, Sachin Gupta resigned from the post of President (Gold Manufacturing) held by him in the company on 31.03.2015 pursuant to the family partition. Since then, neither Sachin Gupta nor his wife Mrs. Shivani Gupta had anything to do with the business of the PCJ. 5.
Feb 13, 2018 · Section 126(1) Cr.P.C. stipulates that the proceedings under 125 Cr.P.C. may be filed in any district where the respondent resides or where his wife resides or where the respondent last resided with his wife, or as the case may be, with the mother of the illegitimate child.
- Brief Facts
- Supreme Court Judgment
- Analysis and Conclusions
The case relates to a renowned jewellery house in India, PC Jewellers Ltd. (“PCJ”). PCJ was founded by three brothers PC Gupta, Amar Chand Garg, and Balram Garg. PC Gupta was the chairman, Amar Chand Garg was the vice chairman, and Balram Garg was the managing director of PCJ. Amar Chand Garg and his branch of family broke away from the business in...
The Court allowed the appeal of the Accused Persons. The Court held that though SAT acknowledged that there was no evidence of communication of any UPSI, it still concluded on mere “preponderance of probability” that it was the late PC Gupta and Balram Garg who disseminated the UPSI. The Court held that SAT erred in failing to consider the family e...
The judgment rightly concludes that mere circumstantial evidence may not be enough to show that there was communication of UPSI. It will have to be demonstrated with sufficient proofs such as emails, letters, call details that the UPSI was communicated by a connected person to the accused persons. Though the judgment has rightly upheld the law, eff...
(1) Sachin Gupta (Plaintiff No. 1) is the son, Miss Reema Gupta (Plaintiff No. 2) is the daughter and Smt. Sushma Gupta (Plaintiff No. 3) is the wife of Shri B. S. Gupta, defendant. The plaintiffs claim partition and rendition of accounts, with respect to the following two properties :
People also ask
What happened to PC Gupta and Sachin Garg?
What is Sachin & Anr v Jhabbu Lal?
Did jhabbhu Lal buy a new house?
Can a Hindu wife claim maintenance?
Nov 4, 2020 · Section 36 of this secular legislation, applicable to all persons who solemnize their marriage in India, provides that a wife is entitled to claim pendente lite maintenance, if she does not have sufficient independent income to support her and for legal expenses.
