Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. May 14, 2020 · Critics Consensus: Ugly, campy, and poorly acted, Battlefield Earth is a stunningly misguided, aggressively bad sci-fi folly. Synopsis: In the year 3000, there are no countries, no...

  3. Is it bad? Yes based on a number of factors. Bad script, bad camera work, bad directing, bad acting and it was filled with giant plot holes throughout the movie. Entertaining? Absolutely. Watching Travolta, Whitaker, and the others chew through miles of scenery on a movie that everyone could tell, even the guy that wanted it made, was going to ...

  4. The critical consensus reads: "Ugly, campy, and poorly acted, Battlefield Earth is a stunningly misguided, aggressively bad sci-fi folly." [ 6 ] On Metacritic , the film has an average score of 9 out of 100, based on 33 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike". [ 74 ]

    • The head of Scientology allegedly oversaw the film’s direction. Despite the Church of Scientology declaring multiple times that Battlefield Earth had nothing to do with their faith, former members of the church have reported that many higher-ups in the organization played a vital role in the development of the film.
    • The film was originally going to be made back in the ‘80s. The 1980s is a decade known for turning out a number of outlandish sci-fi and action films, including such cult classics as Escape from New York and Repo Man.
    • Even Tom Cruise allegedly thought the film was a bad idea. If you had to guess one celebrity that would have been fully onboard with this film other than John Travolta, it would probably have been Tom Cruise.
    • It bankrupted the production company. After it was discovered that Franchise Pictures falsely reported that its production costs were $31 million more than they actually were, the company was sued by Intertainment AG and forced to pay over $120 million in damages.
    • It's based off a novel by the founder of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard. I don't know how much more there is to say about this. I um... yep, I'm done.
    • It's unclear how many fingers the 'Psychlos' have. Sometimes five, sometimes six, nobody cared enough to count and it changes from cut to cut. There might be a drinking game to be made from how often it changes, I'm just saying.
    • Dutch tilts, folks. Dutch tilts. A Dutch tilt (or an oblique angle as they should now and forever be called due to the fact that the etymology of ‘Dutch’ angles is essentially a slur from the Anglo-Dutch wars)—anyways, it’s a camera effect that’s SUPER complicated.
    • The battle wasn't that great and didn't take up much screen time. I’ll say it again, with feeling. The battle in Battlefield Earth was barely a blip in this whole movie, despite the promises made by the movie poster (and title).
  5. Jul 11, 2022 · As of 2022, Battlefield Earth has a “rotten” score of 3% on Rotten Tomatoes, with the critical consensus being: “Ugly, campy and poorly acted, Battlefield Earth is a stunningly misguided, aggressively bad sci-fi folly.”

  6. Sep 13, 2023 · Critics mercilessly panned Battlefield Earth, calling it historically bad, and it has become a punchline for jokes about bad movies.