Yahoo India Web Search

Sign In

Search results

  2. People also ask

  3. indiankanoon.org › doc › 166329624Amit Kapoor vs Ramesh Chander & Anr on 13 September, 2012

    Sep 13, 2012 · According to Amit Kapoor, he knew Ramesh Chander Sibbal for the last 10 years. Father of Amit Kapoor was running a paint brush business and had purchased property No.C-225, Tagore Garden, Delhi through the said Ramesh Chander Sibbal.

  4. www.casemine.com › search › inAMIT KAPOOR Vs. RAMESH CHANDER & ANR | Indian Case Law - CaseMine

    Sep 13, 2012 · According to Amit Kapoor, he kne...Chander Sibbal for the last 10 years. The father of Amit Kapoor was running a paint brush business and had purchased Property No. C-225, Tagore Garden, Delhi through the said Ramesh Chander Sibbal. Since...for post-mortem.

  5. vlex.in › vid › amit-kapoor-vs-ramesh-572102030Criminal Appeal No. 1407 of 2012 (Arising out of SLP (Crl ...

    Sep 13, 2012 · According to Amit Kapoor, he knew Ramesh Chander Sibbal for the last 10 years. Father of Amit Kapoor was running a paint brush business and had purchased property No. C-225, Tagore Garden, Delhi through the said Ramesh Chander Sibbal.

    • Supreme Court (India)
    • A.K. Patnaik and Swatanter Kumar, JJ.
    • September 13, 2012

  6. www.latestlaws.com › latest-caselaw › 2012Amit Kapoor Vs. Ramesh Chander & ANR. [September 13, 2012]

    However, like any other freedom, this freedom also has limitations. It is a settled proposition that the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression enshrined under Article 19 (1) (a) of the Constitution of India (for short 'the Constitution') encompasses the right to impart and receive information.

  7. www.shadesofknife.in › amit-kapoor-vs-rameshAmit Kapoor Vs Ramesh Chander & Anr on 13 September, 2012

    Jun 3, 2018 · Amit Kapoor Vs Ramesh Chander & Anr on 13 September, 2012. Posted on June 3, 2018 by ShadesOfKnife. In the judgment of Apex Court, a Quash order by the High Court is set aside. Thus, we are of the considered view that the finding returned by the High Court suffers from an error of law.

  8. www.the-laws.com › Encyclopedia › BrowseAMIT KAPOOR Vs. RAMESH CHANDER - the-laws.com

    VERSUS. RAMESH CHANDERRespondents. Referred Judgements :-. SAVITA V. STATE OF RAJASTHAN[REFERRED TO]M/S. PEPSI FOODS LTD. AND ANR. V. SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE AND ORS.[REFERRED TO] STATE OF BIHAR VS. RAMESH SINGH [REFERRED TO] RAJ KAPOOR VS. STATE [REFERRED TO] STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS.

  9. main.sci.gov.in › supremecourt › 2019/21929/21929REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE ...

    Amit Kapoor v. Ramesh Chander and another (2012) 9 SCC 460, the Supreme Court held as under:-“17. Framing of a charge is an exercise of jurisdiction by the trial court in terms of Section 228 of the Code, unless the accused is discharged under Section 227 of the Code. Under both these provisions, the court is