Search results
Maneka Gandhi Case UPSC Notes:-Download PDF HereManeka Gandhi Case. Case Summary – Maneka Gandhi (Petitioners) V Union of India (Respondents) The landmark ruling in Maneka Gandhi versus Union of India, which stands as a bulwark of the Right of Personal Liberty granted by Article 21 of the Constitution, started when the passport of the petitioner in this case, was impounded by the authorities under the provisions of the Passport Act.
Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India on 25 January, 1978 Equivalent citations: 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621 Author: M. Hameedullah Beg ... In case the authority refuses to grant it; it is required to record in writing a brief statement of his reasons which are to be furnished to the person concerned unless the authority for reasons specified in sub-section (3) refuses to furnish a copy. ...
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in which the Court significantly expanded the interpretation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.It overruled A. K. Gopalan v.State of Madras, which had implied the exclusiveness of fundamental rights, and established a relationship between Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution (known as the 'golden triangle' or 'trinity'),: 222 holding that a law depriving a person of ...
Feb 21, 2024 · In the Maneka Gandhi case, the Passports Act was the statute which was used to impound the passport of the petitioner and she was not allowed to travel abroad. The Passports Act invariably states that it is a legal necessity to provide reasons for impounding the passport of an individual and the authority making such an impoundment must furnish the reasons in writing to the individual whose passport is seized. On the contrary, the statute states that the authority can deny furnishing the ...
May 3, 2020 · In conclusion, Maneka Gandhi’s case, gave the term ‘personal liberty’ widest possible interpretation and gave effect to the intention of the drafters of the Constitution. This case, while adding a whole new dimension to the concept of ‘personal liberty’, extended the protection of Art. 14 to the personal liberty of every person and additional protection of Art. 19 to the personal liberty of every citizen.
Jun 1, 2020 · Case Name: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India. Court: Supreme Court of India. Citation – 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621, 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621. Coram: Hameedullah Beg (CJI), Y.V.Chandrachud, P.N Bhagwati, V.R. Krishna Iyer, N.L.Untwalia, S.M. Fazal Ali& P.S.Kailasam. Theme: Transformation of the judicial view on Article 21 of the Constitution of India so as to imply many more Fundamental Rights from Article 21.
In the case of Maneka Gandhi v Union of India, the court found that "Democracy is based essentially on free debate and open discussion, for that is the only corrective of government action in a democratic setup." In 1980, Gandhi gave birth to a son, Feroze, named after his paternal grandfather. Her mother-in-law added the name Varun. Gandhi was suddenley widowed at age just twenty-three years old, and her Varun son just 100 days old, when her husband died in an air crash.
The Maneka Gandhi case is often regarded as the beginning of a new era in Indian human rights jurisprudence. It transformed the Supreme Court into a powerful protector of human rights, acting as an "institutional ombudsman of human rights." This decision set a precedent for broader interpretations of constitutional rights and established the judiciary as a crucial defender of individual liberties, even in challenging political circumstances. ...
Aug 30, 2018 · Equivalent Citation- 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621 Petitioner: Maneka Gandhi Respondent: Union of India Date of Judgment: 25/01/1978 BENCH: Hameedullah Beg (CJI), Y.V.Chandrachud, P.N Bhagwati, V.R. Krishna Iyer, N.L.Untwalia, S.M. Fazal Ali& P.S.Kailasam. Background. The Supreme Court in Satwant Singh held that right to travel abroad is well within the ambit of Article 21. Therefore, to combat the above laid down law the Parliament enacted Passports Act 1967. Passport Act, 1967 empowers ...
Feb 2, 2024 · The legal analysis in Maneka Gandhi’s case embarks on an exploration of constitutional values and the delicate balance between executive powers and individual rights. The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Y.V. Chandrachud and a bench of distinguished justices, grapples with the question of whether the government’s actions were arbitrary and violative of the petitioner’s fundamental rights.
