Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. Mar 6, 2021 · Lalman Shukla V. Gauri Dutt is touted as a landmark judgment for the validity of the contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The case was filed in the Allahabad high court in the year 1913 and was presided over by Justice Banerji at the Allahabad High Court.

  2. Feb 26, 2021 · In this article, we would be dealing with the case analysis of Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt and along with it we would examine the aspects of the contract which are, offer and acceptance. Facts The case, Lalman Shukla v. Gauri Dutt, was dealt with in Allahabad High Court after the lower court dismissed the claims of the plaintiff.

  3. After knowing about the reward Lalman Shukla claimed the money from his master Gauri Dutt. But Gauri Dutt denied paying the reward of Rs 501 to him. As a result the plaintiff Lalman Shukla filed a case against Gauri Dutt his master for not giving him the reward as he is not entitled to recover for the performance of his act.

  4. May 14, 2021 · Lalman Shukla vs Gauri Dutt case (1913) case examines the existence of a Contract if there is no acceptance. Acceptance is that of a Contract like a lighted matchstick to a train filled with gunpowder.

  5. Aug 22, 2023 · Six months after the said incident occurred, Gauri Dutt sacked the plaintiff. After removing from the job, the plaintiff claimed the reward of Rs 501. As a result, the plaintiff Lalman Shukla filed a case against Gauri Dutt, his master, for not rewarding him as he was entitled to.

  6. Jul 25, 2023 · Gauri Dutt, the Plaintiff, Lalman Shukla, appealed against the defendant, Gauri Dutt, claiming a reward for finding Gauri Dutt’s missing nephew. However, the court dismissed the appeal, stating that for a valid contract to exist, there must be both knowledge and consent to the offer.

  7. Jun 26, 2022 · Facts Of Lalman Shukla Vs Gauri Dutt Case. The defendant’s (Gauri Dutt) nephew went missing and absconded from his wife. On hearing this, Gauri Dutt sent out a few of his servants in order to search for him. The plaintiff (Lalman Shukla) was one of the servants who went out to search for the absconded nephew.

  1. People also search for