Search results
Aug 11, 2020 · This Court in Controller of Estate Duty (supra), placed reliance on Satrughan Isser v. Sabujpari, & Ors., AIR 1967 SC 272. In case the right to partition by a widow has not been exercised, there is no severance of Hindu coparcenary, and on death of coparcener, there is no dissolution of coparcenary.
Oct 1, 2020 · To know more about the Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma & Others, along with 7 other matters in brief, please refer to the video below: After the amendment Act of 2005, a Division bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Prakash & Others Vs.
So in Vineeta sharma v. Rakesh Sharma a three judge constitutional bench was setup to resolve the issues and give the correct interpretation of section 6 of the amended Hindu Succession Act, 2005.
Mar 29, 2024 · The case of Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma dealt with the interpretation of amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which granted daughters equal coparcenary rights as sons.
VINEETA SHARMA v. RAKESH SHARMA. Smart Summary (Beta) Leave granted. The captioned appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 15.05.2018 in R.F.A No.301 of 2017 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. In view of the conflict between two, Two Judge Bench decisions of this Court vis. Prakash v.
Jan 13, 2022 · One of the most welcomed and awaited verdicts on the rights of women, especially as daughters in the property of the family by birth, had arrived in a famous case of Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, which was also part of various Special leave petitions dealt with that major issue.
Jul 27, 2021 · The verdict of Vineeta Sharma has cleared the uncertainty about the law & made it clear that the amendment of the Hindu Succession Act, granting equal right to inherit the ancestral property to daughters would have a retrospective effect.
