Search results
May 15, 2021 · Learn about the difference between invitation to offer and offer in contract law from this case. The Privy Council held that no contract was formed between the parties as the telegram was not an offer that could be accepted.
Harvey v. Facey is an important case in Contract Law. It is an example where the quotation of the price was held not to be an offer. Its importance is that it defined the difference between an offer and supply of information.
Harvey v Facey [1893], [1] is a contract law case decided by the United Kingdom Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on appeal from the Supreme Court of Judicature of Jamaica. In 1893 the Privy Council held final legal jurisdiction over most of the British Caribbean n. [2] .
Learn about the Privy Council's decision in Harvey v Facey, a case involving a telegraphic contract for the sale of property. Find out why the claimant's offer was not accepted by the defendant's silence and what this case means for contract law.
May 10, 2024 · Learn how the Privy Council decided in 1893 that a statement of price in response to an inquiry is not an offer but an invitation to offer. Explore the legal principles and implications of this landmark case for contract formation and communication.
Dec 7, 2021 · Learn about the facts, issues, judgement and rule of Harvey vs. Facey, a landmark case in contract law. Find out how the concept of invitation to treat was established and how it applies in Indian law.
A case brief of Harvey v. Facey, a 1893 decision by the Privy Council of the United Kingdom on the validity of a contract for the sale of Jamaican real property. The brief includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and procedural disposition of the case.
