Search results
INDIRA SAWHNEY Vs. RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 13/12/1999 BENCH: D.P.Wadhwa, M.J.Rao, M.B.Shah JUDGMENT: M. JAGANNADHA RAO,J. The cases in this batch raise common issues relating to the identification of ’creamy layer’ among the Backward Classes in the State of Kerala and the implementation of the
Aug 8, 1991 · Supreme Court of India. Indra Sawhney & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 8 August, 1991. Bench: K.N. Singh, M.H. Kania, Kuldip Singh, P.B. Sawant. CASE NO.: Writ Petition (civil) 930 of 1990. PETITIONER: INDRA SAWHNEY & ORS. RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/08/1991. BENCH:
Dec 4, 1991 · Supreme Court of India. Indra Sawhney vs Union Of India & Ors on 4 December, 1991. Bench: M.H. Kania, S.R. Pandian, T.K. Thommen. CASE NO.: Writ Petition (civil) 930 of 1990. PETITIONER: INDRA SAWHNEY . RESPONDENT: UNION OF INDIA & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/12/1991. BENCH: M.H. KANIA & M.N. VENKATACHALLIAH & S.R. PANDIAN & T.K. THOMMEN & A.M.
Mar 13, 2024 · Brief summary of the Indra Sawhney judgement. The landmark Indra Sawhney judgement is a lengthy piece of judgement and for the ease of the readers, the crux of the judgement is summarised as follows: Under Article 16(4), backward classes of citizens can be identified on the basis of caste and not just on an economic basis.
Indra Sawhney v. Union of India1 (hereinafter referred to as, ‘Indra Sawhney-I’). In the said judgement, this Court recommended constitution of a permanent body at the Central level and at the level of the States to deal with the inclusion, under-inclusion and over-inclusion of groups in the lists of other backward classes of citizens. This ...
Oct 1, 1990 · Indra Sawhney & Ors vs Union Of India on 1 October, 1990. Warning on translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. Select the following parts of the judgment. Facts. Respondent's Arguments. Precedent Analysis.
Indra Sawhney Case UPSC Notes:-Download PDF Here Supreme Court judgement on Indra Shawney Case forms an essential part of the polity and governance segments of the IAS syllabus. Get a list of landmark SC judgements for the UPSC exam in the linked article.
Plaintiff (s): Union of India. Procedural History: The matter was adjourned on an earlier occasion to provide the Union of India an opportunity to clarify whether the Notification dated August 13, 1990 was being implemented. The present government is committed to the principle of reservation for SEBCs.
Get free access to the complete judgment in Indra Sawhney v. Union Of India And Others on CaseMine.
Indra Sawhney, the petitioner in this case, made three principal arguments against the Order: The extension of reservation violated the Constitutional guarantee of equality of opportunity. Caste was not a reliable indicator of backwardness.
