Search results
Aggrieved by the same, the Petitioners (Ms. Anuradha Bhasin and Mr. Ghulam Nabi Azad) approached this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking issuance of an appropriate writ for setting aside or quashing any and all order(s), notification(s), direction(s) and/or circular(s) issued by the Respondents under which any/all modes of ...
Feb 21, 2024 · Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India is a landmark judgement which underlines the growing importance of the internet in today’s times and imposes limitations on the power of the government to issue orders imposing blanket ban on internet services.
Jan 10, 2020 · Case Summary and Outcome. The Supreme Court of India ruled that an indefinite suspension of internet services would be illegal under Indian law and that orders for internet shutdown must satisfy the tests of necessity and proportionality.
May 18, 2020 · FACTS OF ANURADHA BHASIN V UNION OF INDIA. The genesis of the issue starts with the suspension of mobile, landline and internet services in the state of Jammu and Kashmir (hereinafter ‘J&K’) on August 4, 2019 along with restrictions on movement in certain areas.
Feb 1, 2024 · The case of Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) emphasized that government-imposed restrictions on Internet access must be temporary, limited, lawful, necessary, and proportionate.
This case comment analyses Anuradha Bhasin vs. Union of India, a case that establishes a derivative and not a distinct, freestanding fundamental right to internet access.
May 23, 2020 · BRIEF FACTS- The issue began with the security advisory issued by the Civil Secretariat, Home Department, Government of Jammu and Kashmir stating to cut short their stay and make their safe arrangements to go back. Subsequently, educational institutions and offices were also shut down until further orders.
