Search results
In the present case, if the arguments urged by the petitioners 949 were to prevail, it would lead to the inevitable consequence that the amendments made in the Constitution both in 1951 and 1955 would be rendered invalid and a large number of decisions dealing with the validity of the Acts included in the Ninth Schedule which have been ...
Apr 18, 2024 · The present article provides a detailed analysis of the landmark judgement in Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1964). It elaborates on the factual background, facts, issues, judgement of the Court, opinions of the judges and the laws applied in the said case.
Sajjan Singh case (1965) In this case also, the SC held that the Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution including the Fundamental Rights. It is noteworthy to point out that two dissenting judges, in this case, remarked whether the fundamental rights of citizens could become a plaything of the majority party in Parliament.
May 11, 2023 · Case Title: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan. Court: Supreme Court of India. Citation: AIR 1965 SC 845. Judges: P. B Gajendragadkar, K. Subba Rao, K.N Wanchoo, M Hitayatullah, J. C Shah. Date: 31st March 1965. Facts. Ratlam, a princely state that eventually joined the Indian Union, was governed by Sajjan Singh.
Nov 7, 2022 · In the above-mentioned Sajjan Singh v State of Rajasthan case, the Appellant claimed the following: The powers under Article 368 were misused to overpower the rights given to the State judiciary through Article 226 of the Constitution, thereby violating the rules as per Article 368 as well.
Jul 21, 2023 · Case Title: Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan. Court: Supreme Court of India. Citation: AIR 1965 SC 845. Judges: P. B Gajendragadkar, K. Subba Rao, K.N Wanchoo, M Hitayatullah, J. C Shah. Date: 31st March 1965. Facts of the Case: Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan.
In -- 'Sarat Kumar v. Official Assignee of Calcutta ', AIR 1931 Cal 79 (B), there was an appeal to the Privy Council from an order of the High Court setting aside an ex parte decree, and ordering rehearing of a suit on the original side.
Mar 5, 2024 · The “Sajjan Singh vs State Of Rajasthan” case is centred on the legitimacy of the Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act of 1964, which tried to protect the legality of legislative provisions related to agricultural reform that were being challenged.
Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 02.02.2009, at 02.00 a.m., Mr. Narendra Singh Shekhawat, Assistant Director Enforcement, Excise Enforcement Station Rural, Jodhpur with other personnel, conducted a Nakabandi at Sarhad Lohawas , Main Road Ramasani.
Aug 2, 2022 · COURT: Supreme Court of India. JUDGES: Gajendragadkar, P.B. (Cj), Wanchoo, K.N., Hidayatullah, M., Dayal, Raghubar, Mudholkar, J.R. REFERENCE: 1965 AIR 845. PARTIES. Petitioner: Sajjan Singh. Respondent: State of Rajasthan.
