Search results
Apr 22, 2019 · v. Sudhirkumar Shrivastava and Others ________________ Respondent(s). Civil Appeal Nos. 4031-4032 of 2019 [Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 32868-32869 of 2018], decided on April 22, 2019
The appellant-husband thereafter filed Contempt Petition No.304 of 2018 submitting inter alia that respondent nos.1 to 4 had not followed certain directions issued by this Court in Arnesh Kumar v.
Oct 16, 2020 · Sudhir Kumar Singh, Respondent No.1 in the appeals arising out of SLP (C) No. 5136 of 2020 and SLP (C) No. 7351 of 2020, was declared as the successful bidder for the Bhawanipur-I centre, at the rate of 341% ASOR, the other successful tenderers for Mirzapur, Bhawanipur-II and Tendu (Sonbhadra) being at 314%, 338% and 290% ASOR respectively.
- Background of The Case
- Public Policy – The Governing Law
- Maintenance Is A Statutory Right
The parties, in this case, were married as per Hindu rites and had a minor daughter together. Due to differences they entered into consent terms for a divorce. The agreement included among other things the withdrawal by the wife of criminal proceedings against the husband and the relinquishing of her right to alimony and maintenance as well as the ...
The Bombay High Court, in the matter of Ramchandra Laxman Kamble vs Shobha Ramchandra Kamble and Anr, Writ Petition No 3439 of 2016, while dealing with the right to maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, had held that even if the wife gave up or relinquished her right to claim maintenance, at any time in the future, it was opposed to public policy and...
Right to maintenance of a wife is governed by the following statutes: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 125 of the Code provides that “if any person, having sufficient means, neglects or refuses to maintain….his wife, unable to maintain herself…a Magistrate of the first class, may, upon proof of such neglect or refusal, order such person to ...
Apr 22, 2019 · The Supreme Court on April 22, 2019, in the case of Ganesh v. Sudhirkumar Shrivastava & Ors., has observed that the wife cannot give up the rights which vest in the daughter insofar as maintenance and other issues are concerned, during divorce by mutual consent.
This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 13.11.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-10 (Central) in Suit, being TM No.123 of 2019, titled Sudhir Kumar @ S. Baliyan v.
People also ask
Is leave granted in Ganesh V Sudhirkumar Shrivastava?
Who deprived the respondent of a valuable right in kn Guruswamy v State of Mysore?
Who filed a petition for divorce in Aurangabad?
When did the English court hold a case V Spackman V Srivastava?
Sudhirkumar Shrivastava & ors. (SC) Supreme Court of India. Before: Uday Umesh Lalit & Indu Malhotra, JJ. Civil Appeal Nos.4031-4032 of 2019. (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.32868-32869 of 2018) Decided on: 22.04.2019. Ganesh - Appellant. Versus. Sudhirkumar Shrivastava & ors. - Respondents.
